Vincent Smith

#1

VolunteerHillbilly

Spike Drinks, Not Trees
Joined
Sep 26, 2005
Messages
40,787
Likes
15,227
#1
I guess Drayton was able to keep some irons hot in the Sunshine State. Supposedly, the Vols are in on another FLA RB. No clue what the chances are though.
 
#2
#2
Per Rivals, Tennessee isn't even on a list, and they just reported that Michigan has a steady lead.
 
#4
#4
I don't have the membership, but I looked at his schools that he was considering, and there were about 9 on there...none of which were Tennessee.

There was Michigan, Miami, Clemson, and others...but no Tennessee.
Maybe that info was for subscribers only. Oh well.
 
#5
#5
I don't have the membership, but I looked at his schools that he was considering, and there were about 9 on there...none of which were Tennessee.

There was Michigan, Miami, Clemson, and others...but no Tennessee.
Maybe that info was for subscribers only. Oh well.

Sometimes, those lists are wrong.
 
#9
#9
I just don't see why we are going after this guy. We have plenty of RBs, we got Giles who should be great, and we're in the running still for Oku. Why are we going after another 'under the radar' RB? Why does Clawson want so many freaking RBs?
 
#10
#10
I just don't see why we are going after this guy. We have plenty of RBs, we got Giles who should be great, and we're in the running still for Oku. Why are we going after another 'under the radar' RB? Why does Clawson want so many freaking RBs?


Brian Westbrook was a small, 'under the radar' running back. Look what Clawson and Drayton did with him. We have depth at RB but Poole and Creer were not recruited by the new staff and they like to run a two back system. Foster is a senior, Hardesty could go down at any moment and a couple of the backs that we have recruited are looking to be turned into LB's. Extra RB's can always be used on special teams.
 
#11
#11
I just don't see why we are going after this guy. We have plenty of RBs, we got Giles who should be great, and we're in the running still for Oku. Why are we going after another 'under the radar' RB? Why does Clawson want so many freaking RBs?

He might be a backup to Oku also?
 
#13
#13
I guess that makes sense, but I'd still feel more comfortable investing a scholly in an 'under the radar' player at a position of need for us...like DT
 
#14
#14
I guess that makes sense, but I'd still feel more comfortable investing a scholly in an 'under the radar' player at a position of need for us...like DT

I understand your point, but I don't think you can pass on the No. 1 all purpose back in the nation.
 
#22
#22
Stewart was about 6'1, maybe a little light but tall for RB.

Yeah, im pretty sure the moniker "Little Man" was just sarcasm from his father.
James Stewart played at 6'1 225. No one would have said he was too small, lol.
 
#24
#24
is scott responsible for anyone yet?


Scott appears to be a master recruiter like TT was. He had been partially responsible for several signees and has strong relationships with lots of other prospects. He will end up being more valuable than Drayton.
 
#25
#25
Scott appears to be a master recruiter like TT was. He had been partially responsible for several signees and has strong relationships with lots of other prospects. He will end up being more valuable than Drayton.

I don't know about that...if he does it's going to take a while. Drayton has the experience of recruiting big time players to a big time program.
 

VN Store



Back
Top