Vince Foster Files Missing From National Archive

#28
#28
63335736.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#29
#29
Regarding the press and coverage of Clinton, they are the "free press" only in having the freedom to report as they will. They're in it for the money. Right now, Trump sells - brings in the eyeballs & ears - especially perceived Trump missteps. Hillary doesn't sell. She has to buy ad space to get exposure.

The media isn't unbiased, but the idea that some larger conspiracy exists to promote Hillary's candidacy at the expense of Trump's is loony tunes. There is as much or more yellow press on the right as there is on the left. Right now, it's eyeballs & ears driving media reporting, plain and $imple.

It is incumbent upon the consumer of news, the caster of the ballot to sift through the scribble & babble and decide. This is the American way. I'd rather USA than any number of other places around the globe.
 
#30
#30
lawgator1 said:
What was there, please?
Click to expand...

"After filing a Freedom of Information request, it was determined that the agents' reports have gone missing"

Two FBI agents' reports on Hillary's vindictive tirades against Foster the day before he was found dead. The FBI reports were there previously. Now they are not. What they show, of course, is debatable,...but these are now gone which leads one to seriously wonder if other damning evidence existed along with them.

As for you LG.. you're quite transparent.

https://youtu.be/PRvkU0MmNLg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#31
#31
Orangedogsrule said:
"After filing a Freedom of Information request, it was determined that the agents' reports have gone missing"

Two FBI agents' reports on Hillary's vindictive tirades against Foster the day before he was found dead. The FBI reports were there previously. Now they are not. What they show, of course, is debatable,...but these are now gone which leads one to seriously wonder if other damning evidence existed along with them.

As for you LG.. you're quite transparent.

https://youtu.be/PRvkU0MmNLg
Click to expand...

This "damning evidence" has been seen and reviewed for 20+ years. What in its character has changed to transform this into some smoking gun?

8syum0.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#34
#34
I had to rearrange your post a little:
Tin Man said:
It is incumbent upon the consumer of news, the caster of the ballot to sift through the scribble & babble and decide. This is the American way. I'd rather USA than any number of other places around the globe.
Click to expand...

This is correct^^^^^^^^

But what's below:


Tin Man said:
Regarding the press and coverage of Clinton, they are the "free press" only in having the freedom to report as they will. They're in it for the money. Right now, Trump sells - brings in the eyeballs & ears - especially perceived Trump missteps. Hillary doesn't sell. She has to buy ad space to get exposure.

The media isn't unbiased, but the idea that some larger conspiracy exists to promote Hillary's candidacy at the expense of Trump's is loony tunes. There is as much or more yellow press on the right as there is on the left. Right now, it's eyeballs & ears driving media reporting, plain and $imple.
Click to expand...

is:lolabove::lolabove::lolabove::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol:
 
#35
#35
ClearwaterVol said:
This "damning evidence" has been seen and reviewed for 20+ years. What in its character has changed to transform this into some smoking gun?

8syum0.jpg
Click to expand...

Aw ... don't be goofy. Just because your common sense & reading comprehension scores are low for the day don't give you license to call someone gullible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#36
#36
Orangedogsrule said:
Aw ... don't be goofy. Just because your common sense & reading comprehension scores are low for the day don't give you license to call someone gullible.
Click to expand...

Okay, give me your logical, coherent and plausible scenario of what happened.

And secondly, what salient fact did I miss?
 
#37
#37
I really do question the reading comprehension abilities of you right wing nutjobs on here. Let me try to make this analogy again, in terms you perhaps you will understand.


"I once looked in a box that had in it A, B, and C.

I asked, where are D and E?

They said they had no D and E.

Therefore, D and E are missing!"

Can you seriously not understand in your pea-sized brains what is missing from this sequence of statements? What key assumption is being made ?
 
#38
#38
lawgator1 said:
I really do question the reading comprehension abilities of you right wing nutjobs on here. Let me try to make this analogy again, in terms you perhaps you will understand.


"I once looked in a box that had in it A, B, and C.

I asked, where are D and E?

They said they had no D and E.

Therefore, D and E are missing!"

Can you seriously not understand in your pea-sized brains what is missing from this sequence of statements? What key assumption is being made ?
Click to expand...

Obviously you have no clue how detailed the gov't works with property and real property.

Evidently you don't understand what inventory means. There is a itemized list of the contents in each box. when there's 12 items on said list and you count 11, something is missing. How hard was that math LG? Then they inventory the box and see what's missing. pretty easy for people with a brain, obviously you dont have one so leave the conversation, please.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#39
#39
Here's a better analogy.

My wife goes to the grocery store and asks if I need anything. I say "grab a six pack of Sweetwater 420". Later that night, long after the grocery store run has been completed, I realize there isn't beer in the fridge. It is missing. It should be there based on our previous conversation and the implied agreement to get the beer. It is OK to use the term "missing" in this context.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#40
#40
AirVol said:
Obviously you have no clue how detailed the gov't works with property and real property.

Evidently you don't understand what inventory means. There is a itemized list of the contents in each box. when there's 12 items on said list and you count 11, something is missing. How hard was that math LG? Then they inventory the box and see what's missing. pretty easy for people with a brain, obviously you dont have one so leave the conversation, please.
Click to expand...


Where is that in the story? I must have skipped right over that part.

Or it wasn't in there.
 
#43
#43
AirVol said:
It's didn't say if it happened on a rainy day either.
Click to expand...


So the author assumed the existence of such interviews and he bases the claim that the interviews are missing on his own assumption that they once existed.

And the right wing nutjobs wonder how the rest of us sane people can question how it is you come to these bizzaro conclusions.
 
#44
#44
ClearwaterVol said:
Okay, give me your logical, coherent and plausible scenario of what happened.

And secondly, what salient fact did I miss?
Click to expand...

I said that the meaning of the reports is debatable.

Paraphrasing from the link...

The FBI report on Foster's suicide found Hilliarly's vindictive, fault finding, blame game, name calling, ("always be a hick lawyer") rage at Foster in front of his peers to be part and parcel of his on going depression, leading within a few days to his suicide.

Ken Starr must have thought Hillary's behavior, as depicted in the FBI agents's reports, not as pertinent. His investigation did not reach the same conclusion that Hilliary's rage, and blame, and belittling of Foster in front of peers during a group meeting as having a bearing on his suicide. The FBI did. So it's debatable.

The FBI agents reports could be found nowhere, not even among as yet to be released documents. One can certainly wonder, -as it is reasonable to do so- if other among the thousands and thousands of pages of evidence that is not lost, if there exists much more damning data that if only were connected properly would cast a much more serious light on Hiliarly's evil personality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#45
#45
lawgator1 said:
So the author assumed the existence of such interviews and he bases the claim that the interviews are missing on his own assumption that they once existed.

And the right wing nutjobs wonder how the rest of us sane people can question how it is you come to these bizzaro conclusions.
Click to expand...

The lack of something which should exist based on proper protocol, can be said to be missing. That is proper. The lack of a report is just as damning as if it had been filed and then smuggled out. Being pedantic won't help your case.
 
#46
#46
Hillary Clinton once threw a "Bible at the back of a Secret Service agent’s head, part of a pattern of unhinged rage that the now-presumptive Democratic nominee exhibited, as exposed for the first time in former Secret Service agent Gary Byrne’s grueling insider account of Hillary Rodham Clinton."
 

Attachments

  • maxresdefault-147-1030x579.jpg
    maxresdefault-147-1030x579.jpg
    25.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#47
#47
Orangedogsrule said:
I said that the meaning of the reports is debatable.

Paraphrasing from the link...

The FBI report on Foster's suicide found Hilliarly's vindictive, fault finding, blame game, name calling, ("always be a hick lawyer") rage at Foster in front of his peers to be part and parcel of his on going depression, leading within a few days to his suicide.

Ken Starr must have thought Hillary's behavior, as depicted in the FBI agents's reports, not as pertinent. His investigation did not reach the same conclusion that Hilliary's rage, and blame, and belittling of Foster in front of peers during a group meeting as having a bearing on his suicide. The FBI did. So it's debatable.

The FBI agents reports could be found nowhere, not even among as yet to be released documents. One can certainly wonder, -as it is reasonable to do so- if other among the thousands and thousands of pages of evidence that is not lost, if there exists much more damning data that if only were connected properly would cast a much more serious light on Hiliarly's evil personality.
Click to expand...


That's just awesome right there.

You see, everyone, there is a mountain of evidence of this. The only reason the right wing screech machine cannot show it to us is that it is labeled wrong.

LOL. Gotta love how the main claim is that the Clintons had him killed, that it was not a suicide. And the second claim is that, if it was a suicide, HRC drove him to it by yelling at him in front of some coworkers. And the third claim is that there is proof of this, but it has gone missing. And the fourth claim is, the proof that it ever existed in the first place is that it is not there.

I am just appalled by the idiocy this crap continues to generate and how f%ing stupid people like you are to keep touting it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#48
#48
On the first visit, archivist David Paynter provided the box of records that he said contained the FBI reports of interviews conducted by FBI agents on Foster's death.
On a second visit, archivist James Mathis provided what he said were those same documents.
While the box contained dozens of FBI reports concerning Foster's death - including interviews with the medical examiner, U.S. Park Police officers, and White House aides about the contents of Foster's office - the reports on Hillary Clinton's role in his death were absent.
Click to expand...

So these documents have been viewed by people before and now 20+ years later Hillary deemed them so damning she stole them?

What's more likely that or they were simply misplaced among the millions of pages?
 
#49
#49
lawgator1 said:
So the author assumed the existence of such interviews and he bases the claim that the interviews are missing on his own assumption that they once existed.

And the right wing nutjobs wonder how the rest of us sane people can question how it is you come to these bizzaro conclusions.
Click to expand...

It's 5 o'clock sumwheres uh, LG.

Two FBI agents made separate reports of Hiliarly's rages. Books have been written about her mean, vindictive, and physically violent personality displayed from the beginning of her career, through her time as governor's wife, to Washington and First Lady in the White House. She's a raging self serving lieing wild woman.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#50
#50
lawgator1 said:
That's just awesome right there.

You see, everyone, there is a mountain of evidence of this. The only reason the right wing screech machine cannot show it to us is that it is labeled wrong.

LOL. Gotta love how the main claim is that the Clintons had him killed, that it was not a suicide. And the second claim is that, if it was a suicide, HRC drove him to it by yelling at him in front of some coworkers. And the third claim is that there is proof of this, but it has gone missing. And the fourth claim is, the proof that it ever existed in the first place is that it is not there.

I am just appalled by the idiocy this crap continues to generate and how f%ing stupid people like you are to keep touting it.
Click to expand...

Suicide? No blood, 2 gunshots to the head....should I go on? Foster's office ransacked.....what were they looking for or find?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top