lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 74,063
- Likes
- 43,770
are you saying there are a lot of Phil haters on the board? As you can see, I am new here.
If so, my guess is most of them are young. I think you would have t ogo back to Dickey to see a better winning percentage than what Phil has had since 1998. Majors might have come close in his last 8 years - but I think he still fell short, although he did get the SEC Championships, which, of course, are huge. Still, the point is that the last 8 years have been one of the best 8 year stretches in UT history in terms of winning percentage.
That's exactly what I'm saying. Whether Fulmer has been "successful" -- and for how long -- is an enormous subject of debate on this site. FYI, the debate is often phrased as whether the measure should be 5 years, 8 years, or 10 years.
More siginficantly given your post, the debate is usually whether the proper measure is 1) winning percentage; 2) winning percentage against the top SEC schools; 3) SEC championships; or 4) being "in contention" for the SEC title, even if you don't quite get there.
My perception is that the prcentages of those four groups are
1) 20 %
2) 15 %
3) 40 %
4) 25 %
Being a Gator, I measure in terms of championships. A plurality seem to do so here, though as I suggest above there is a certain contingent that feels that its tough to win those c-ships and so the measure should be wether UT is usually "in the picture," so to speak.
Those who measure objectively winning the SEC are for the most part quite dissastisfied. Those who set the bar at being a contender, for the most part are satisfied.