SayUWantAreVOLution
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Messages
- 11,197
- Likes
- 13,844
I'm unsure what the school will require but essentially this is revenue sharing/pay for play under the guise of NIL. The revenue sharing aspect, I think, is an attempt to prevent future lawsuits related to schools not compensating players basically as employees, but the schools really hate using that term hence the "school NIL" name.So then the NIL contracts are not just private contracts? There are some that the university will control. I thought the $20.5 million revenue sharing was just a payday for the players. Didn’t realize they were going to have to do anything for it other than play for pay. Of course they probably won’t have to do a lot of publicity work (wink, wink). Call me cynical.
Let's face it, if you're sharing revenue you make from guys playing football for your team, you're essentially employing them to play football but that rabbit hole has been discussed here a lot. Employee status is a minefield the NCAA doesn't want.
The other NIL deals are supposed to be vetted by the College Sports Commission which TN and other states are trying kill. Basically, they want no part of the lawsuits when NIL deals are deemed "not acceptable."
