I would like to know how releasing the kid to UM or MSU hurts UT. This looks like nothing more than a pissing match to dictate where the kid plays.
I would like to know how releasing the kid to UM or MSU hurts UT. This looks like nothing more than a pissing match to dictate where the kid plays.
There are all kind of crazy theories out there. Truth be told...none really, but the perception is present. Dooley is just making an example of Arnett in case other members on the team have "sick family members". He probably just feels like he can't set the precedent of meeting all Arnett's demands. I don't think there is a complete right or wrong answer here. Everybody is in a compromising position.
That's the thing. Dooley has been put in an awkward position. I understand what he's trying to do. However, he's going to get burned alive for it by the media and rival institutions.
Like you said, it's a lose-lose.
He lost to UK....one of the worst UK teams I've ever seen. Either he wins this year or he is out. I don't know what a rival institution would say to trump that.
Arnett is a true freshman with some potential on a losing team. Frankly, the media outside of Knox or Saginaw doesn't give a rats ass about either UT or Arnett right now.
This is really not that big a deal in the grand scheme of things.
Oh, I agree that it won't have a huge impact on recruiting. I just don't think Dooley can afford many more black marks, and I believe it would be in his best interest to let the kid go.
Would it make that big of a difference?
