USF Chaz Nimrod

Danny White would probably consider Tim Banks the better choice. I would.

Lance Leipold was my 1st choice during the last coaching search. He is an elite coach. It would be better if he was 50 instead of 60. I figure he is nearing retirement.
You might be right. Nothing against Tim Banks, but I much prefer offensive oriented coaches.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpookyAction
He didnt look too remorseful about it last night, LOL!
He will be when he checks his bank account. The NIL at South Florida isn't as sweet as Tennessee. Being top dog at USF and Tennessee has a spread between them. USF writes checks on stamps. We write checks on poster board. It's like Publisher's Clearinghouse knocking on the door.
 
I took USF + 5-

The fake punt call that went for a TD blew the game open.
That play was something else and creative, caught Boise staff off guard. I wished TN had did some fake stuff with our punter
 
That play was something else and creative, caught Boise staff off guard. I wished TN had did some fake stuff with our punter
You mean our Australian Football secret weapon super athlete that has been discussed for 2 seasons without evidence? If we ever do put him to use on a fake it will surprise everyone watching.
Jackson Ross is pre-season 4th team All SEC. Pretty good.

It's time for another generation of Colquitts to punt. I hope there is a couple coming.
 
Happy for Chaz, always thought he had ability once he put it together and figured out the yips he’s looking like the player he was in practice for us

Hope they beat the hell out of Florida next week
 
You mean our Australian Football secret weapon super athlete that has been discussed for 2 seasons without evidence? If we ever do put him to use on a fake it will surprise everyone watching.
Jackson Ross is pre-season 4th team All SEC. Pretty good.

It's time for another generation of Colquitts to punt. I hope there is a couple coming.
HAHAH
It's going to fool everyone including the camera guy 😎
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpookyAction
Look, for the last 2 years we have had receivers running WIDE OPEN that for whatever reason, our QB could not connect with! Hooker is what made that offense hum! Golesh gets far too much credit.
I think he was Heupel's Cutcliff. Having said that, who brought in Hooker? Who brought in Milton to replace him? Who went all in on Nico? The one spot I didn't expect is to struggle with was QB. Not sure what led to those decisions, but it does make me wonder.
 
And that's the thing. Nobody is crowning Golesh or calling him an amazing coach. But turning around a trash program into a winning program virtually overnight is definitely impressive.
Heupel didn't inherit as bad a program, but he's doing his thing in the toughest conference in college football. Gotta give credit where credit is due.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carp
Heupel didn't inherit as bad a program, but he's doing his thing in the toughest conference in college football. Gotta give credit where credit is due.
Heupel inherited 3-7 team with 30 plus players leaving under severe sanctions with a schedule full of national title type and top 15 teams, and has made UT a top 10 program again.

What he has done has been a MUCH better coaching job
 
  • Like
Reactions: KTrain
Heupel inherited 3-7 team with 30 plus players leaving under severe sanctions with a schedule full of national title type and top 15 teams, and has made UT a top 10 program again.

What he has done has been a MUCH better coaching job
In 2 years, Golesh won 14 games when the USF program won 15 in the entire 5 years before he got there.
 
In 2 years, Golesh won 14 games when the USF program won 15 in the entire 5 years before he got there.
Again, the difference was they were playing Cincinnati, SMU, Houston, UCF as conference games along with several P4 teams non conference;
Now they play 1 P5 team OOC and replaced those ranked conference schools with Charlotte, North Texas, FAU, and UTSA
 
Again, the difference was they were playing Cincinnati, SMU, Houston, UCF as conference games along with several P4 teams non conference;
Now they play 1 P5 team OOC and replaced those ranked conference schools with Charlotte, North Texas, FAU, and UTSA
They got blown out nearly every single game from 2020-2022. Stop acting like their schedule made any difference. SMU was barely a .500 team in 2022 and beat them by 18.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheVolsFrog
Again, the difference was they were playing Cincinnati, SMU, Houston, UCF as conference games along with several P4 teams non conference;
Now they play 1 P5 team OOC and replaced those ranked conference schools with Charlotte, North Texas, FAU, and UTSA
Again, it was USF, not a high profile program. You consider all those teams as "inferior" but you're looking at it from a P5 perspective.
 
Again, it was USF, not a high profile program. You consider all those teams as "inferior" but you're looking at it from a P5 perspective.
USF has had success and been ranked as high as #2 in the last decade.... Charlotte, FAU, North Texas, etc ARE inferior to them, and teams like Cincy, SMU, Houston, UCF were a lot tougher which is why they are in P4 conferences currently.

Golesh has improved USF, that wasn't the disagreement, but again you are talking about a 15-12 record vs a much much easier schedule than his predecessor had.

Go back and look at the teams he has beaten the last two seasons...a bunch of 3-9 awful teams
 
USF has had success and been ranked as high as #2 in the last decade.... Charlotte, FAU, North Texas, etc ARE inferior to them, and teams like Cincy, SMU, Houston, UCF were a lot tougher which is why they are in P4 conferences currently.

Golesh has improved USF, that wasn't the disagreement, but again you are talking about a 15-12 record vs a much much easier schedule than his predecessor had.

Go back and look at the teams he has beaten the last two seasons...a bunch of 3-9 awful teams
Um, no. They reached #2 back in 2007, which is not "the last decade", and finished outside the Top 25 that season. In 2008, they peaked at #10 and finished unranked. 2017 was their most consistent/best season since then where they spent every week but one in the rankings, but never higher than #16. And they've finished in the Top 25 twice, best being 2016 at #19 when they were unranked all season until bowl season and final rankings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carp
Yes, Rickyvol77 indeed dropped the mic on his last comment!
Posters always do this as long as this board has been around...rizz up an "up and coming" HC with mediocre or overrated results and act like he's going to be something special and we need to hire in the future..

same as:
Tommy Tubberville
Kirk Ferentz
Mike Leach
Hugh Freeze
Bobby Petrino
Charlie Strong
Scott Frost
Rich Rodirguez
Tommy Bowden
Kevin Sumlin
Chris Petersen
Dan Hawkins
Justin Wilcox
Chip Kelly
Deion Sanders
Paul Johnson
Jeff Brohm
Matt Campbell
PJ Fleck
Matt Rhule
Billy Napier
Dave Clawson
Mike Gundy
James Franklin
Mike Norvell
Mike Elko
Dave Aranda
Art Briles

A bunch of coaches that were supposed to be elite over the decades that people thought were "the next big thing" because they dominated easy schedules OR they pulled of a major upset one time.

So silly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
Heupel inherited 3-7 team with 30 plus players leaving under severe sanctions with a schedule full of national title type and top 15 teams, and has made UT a top 10 program again.

What he has done has been a MUCH better coaching job

Dude puts down Heupel any chance he gets then backtracks his statements when he’s wrong. (Most of the time any way)

I like Golesh but I agree.

Heupel took over a huge dumpster fire with the NCAA sanctions hanging over our heads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77

Advertisement



Back
Top