AllVolForLife_16
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2011
- Messages
- 1,638
- Likes
- 798
Any word on Kevin Steele being retained or let go?
I hope so. That means maybe we get Big Kat from Auburn still.No inside sources, but one would think with the staff departures we’ve already seen take place, Steele would’ve already been let go if he wasn’t going to be retained. Assuming Heupel can trust him, and they can move forward from the Auburn fall out, he would be a great asset to the staff as DC, his recruiting ability, and with his ties to the SEC and the south. Couple that with the fact that he already has a solid relationship with Garner who also is in need of a job, and would help tremendously with recruiting, it’s a no brainer. Think a lot of it will determine how well he will jive with the rest of the defensive assistants Heupel has in mind to pair him with. AP did mention the longer it drags, the more likely it appears Steele will be our DC.
I want to believe this so bad. I think it would be a difference maker for our team.No inside sources, but one would think with the staff departures we’ve already seen take place, Steele would’ve already been let go if he wasn’t going to be retained. Assuming Heupel can trust him, and they can move forward from the Auburn fall out, he would be a great asset to the staff as DC, his recruiting ability, and with his ties to the SEC and the south. Couple that with the fact that he already has a solid relationship with Garner who also is in need of a job, and would help tremendously with recruiting, it’s a no brainer. Think a lot of it will determine how well he will jive with the rest of the defensive assistants Heupel has in mind to pair him with. AP did mention the longer it drags, the more likely it appears Steele will be our DC.
I hope so. That means maybe we get Big Kat from Auburn still.
No inside sources, but one would think with the staff departures we’ve already seen take place, Steele would’ve already been let go if he wasn’t going to be retained. Assuming Heupel can trust him, and they can move forward from the Auburn fall out, he would be a great asset to the staff as DC, his recruiting ability, and with his ties to the SEC and the south. Couple that with the fact that he already has a solid relationship with Garner who also is in need of a job, and would help tremendously with recruiting, it’s a no brainer. Think a lot of it will determine how well he will jive with the rest of the defensive assistants Heupel has in mind to pair him with. AP did mention the longer it drags, the more likely it appears Steele will be our DC.
I'm curious what the hold up is.
From my undersatnding, Randy Shannon was Heupel's DC at UCF primarily because his Florida recruiting ties. Steele seems like a much better fit at UT given that he has recruiting ties through the Southeast and is actually a pretty good DC. Nothing against Shannon. Just think I'd prefer Steele over him.
Reputation will probably keep Garner from being hired.No inside sources, but one would think with the staff departures we’ve already seen take place, Steele would’ve already been let go if he wasn’t going to be retained. Assuming Heupel can trust him, and they can move forward from the Auburn fall out, he would be a great asset to the staff as DC, his recruiting ability, and with his ties to the SEC and the south. Couple that with the fact that he already has a solid relationship with Garner who also is in need of a job, and would help tremendously with recruiting, it’s a no brainer. Think a lot of it will determine how well he will jive with the rest of the defensive assistants Heupel has in mind to pair him with. AP did mention the longer it drags, the more likely it appears Steele will be our DC.
Reputation will probably keep Garner from being hired.
His recruiting has never been considered lily white.
If HF did not get a look, neither will CG..
JMHO.
I thought he got really close while at Georgia.I believe the stipulation during the coaching search was anybody with previous NCAA baggage was considered untouchable. However, Garner has no NCAA baggage that I’m aware of. Sure there’s been a lot of speculation behind his recruiting tactics, but no evidence, all hearsay. I feel like Garner is certainly in play, but understand your point.