The premier Terrorist nation in the world receives $150 BILLION from the Obama regime.
Surely this was a great idea.
Uranium One 'might be' tied to Iran.
Uranium One Deal: Obama Administration Complicit, Not Just | National Review
Keeping Congress in the Dark
Meanwhile, congressional opposition to Russias potential acquisition of American uranium resources began to stir. As Peter Schweizer noted in his essential book,
Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, four senior House members steeped in national-security issues Peter King (R., N.Y.), Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R., Fla.), Spencer Bachus (R., Ala.), and Howard McKeon (R. Calif.) voiced grave concerns, pointing out that
Rosatom had helped Iran, Americas sworn enemy, build its Bushehr nuclear reactor. The members concluded that the take-over of essential US nuclear resources by a government-owned Russian agency . . . would not advance the national security interests of the United States. Republican senator John Barrasso objected to Kremlin control of uranium assets in his state of Wyoming, warning of Russias
disturbing record of supporting nuclear programs in countries that are openly hostile to the United States, specifically Iran and Venezuela. The House began moving a bill expressing disfavor of the Congress regarding Obamas revival of the nuclear-cooperation agreement Bush had abandoned.
Clearly, in this atmosphere, disclosure of the racketeering enterprise that Rosatoms American subsidiary was, at that very moment, carrying out would have been the death knell of the asset transfer to Russia. It would also likely have ended the reset initiative in which Obama and Clinton were deeply invested an agenda that contemplated Kremlin-friendly deals on nuclear-arms control and accommodation of the nuclear program of Russias ally,
Iran. That was not going to be allowed to happen. It appears that no disclosure of Russias racketeering and strong-arming was made to CFIUS or to Congress not by Secretary Clinton, not by Attorney General Holder, and certainly not by President Obama.
In October 2010, CFIUS gave its blessing to Rosatoms acquisition of Uranium One.
It's no secret...the Clinton's and their foundation raked in a cool $145 million in donations and "speaking fees" just from Uranium One- and Rosatom-affiliated donors while Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was supposedly keeping all Clinton Foundation business at "arm's-length."
Update
On 17 October 2017, The Hill reported obtaining evidence that Vadim Mikerin, a Russian official who oversaw the American operations of the Russian nuclear agency Rosatom, was being investigated for corruption by multiple U.S. agencies while the Uranium One deal was up for approval information that apparently was not shared with U.S. officials involved in approving the transaction. The Hill also reported receiving documents and eyewitness testimony indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clintons charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, although no specifics about who those Russian nuclear officials were or how the money was allegedly routed to the Clinton Foundation were given. In any case, none of these revelations prove that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton participated in a quid pro quo agreement to accept payment for approval of the Uranium One deal.
On 24 October 2017, the U.S. House intelligence and oversight committees announced the launch of a joint investigation into the circumstances surrounding the Russian purchase of Uranium One.