Updated Rivals

#301
#301
Ericvol2096 said:
I know it's likely that Marcus Jackson is the only bump we get...but I just feel like Randolph is going to as well...Hubbs called him the future 4 star in one of his articles.
Click to expand...

I saw that also the other day. I agree MJ and Randolph.
 
#303
#303
KnoxVillain said:
Did you not just read what Thunder said just above you?
Click to expand...

I'll help you out on this one Villian...I'm pretty sure 423 and SGM are brothers or father/son or cousins...something along those lines...they're posting tendencies are almost identical...

You should treat anything he says as you would any other troll
 
#304
#304
thunder5 said:
Do you realize that the updated 250 is not the end of the star bumps and that there will be several more by the time the position rankings are updated?

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you didn't realize that....

You should really look into these things before you post...
Click to expand...

Vol423 said:
Someone help me out. Where are all those bumps that our guys were going to get?
Click to expand...

See above...it applies as much to you as it does the person it was originally intended for
 
Last edited:
#305
#305
When will all position rankings and stars be updated. I'm sure that there are four stars and such that won't be in the 250
 
#310
#310
Chris Nee (Rivals) on Tom Smith:

Smith remained a three-star, pretty highly ranked three-star back. He will be a very good college back, is a workhorse, just doesn't have much of a ceiling to reach at the next level.
Click to expand...
 
#311
#311
Every (Rivals) on Justin Worley:

Worley is a system guy with very average arm strength, doesn't move well in the pocket, and he has a hard time spinning the ball.
Click to expand...

Worley got a bump to 5.7.
 
#312
#312
Yeah because we all know that there are no RB's in college football that put up great stats without 4.3 speed. Please. He has every tool necessary to be a top flight college RB.
 
#317
#317
Honestly, I'm done caring about rankings and stars. I'm very happy with the way our class is shaping up and the needs it fills. For whatever reason the guys we pick up just don't get any love from Rivals and I'm really convinced it has become political the last year or two, but oh well. I like the direction we're headed with or without more stars.
 
#319
#319
SeanJean said:
Honestly, I'm done caring about rankings and stars. I'm very happy with the way our class is shaping up and the needs it fills. For whatever reason the guys we pick up just don't get any love from Rivals and I'm really convinced it has become political the last year or two, but oh well. I like the direction we're headed with or without more stars.
Click to expand...

you're just now not caring for stars....where have you been the past 5 years. you should have always had this attitude
 
#320
#320
I'm admittedly new to recruiting, but I think offer lists and on field results are a lot more indicative of a kid's talent than how many decimal points a bunch of overweight nerds at Rivals decide to give a kid. The amount of movement the lists have had, almost always in the favor of the hotter more sexy schools at the moment, it just has to make you wonder.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top