Update on Reese, McKnight & Mostella

#151
#151
SeniorDrill said:
Clearing his problem up with online courses is a little sketchy. Hope it works out!
Click to expand...

It wont...and why are we all of a sudden like...going after 'sketchy' guys that cant make it? We haven't had this problem for the last 3-4 years...why now....will this be an ongoing problem....going after knuckleheads?
 
#152
#152
Because CDT had a very limited time to throw together a roster, in these situations you have to take a couple of risks. It won't be like this every year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#153
#153
HBCButch said:
It wont...and why are we all of a sudden like...going after 'sketchy' guys that cant make it? We haven't had this problem for the last 3-4 years...why now....will this be an ongoing problem....going after knuckleheads?
Click to expand...

This is a joke right. Man had just weeks to pull out a class, and that was after signing day. Hope all of them make it but if they don't, I am not going to come unglued. I already feel we are so much ahead of were UT was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#154
#154
utchuckster said:
This is a joke right. Man had just weeks to pull out a class, and that was after signing day. Hope all of them make it but if they don't, I am not going to come unglued. I already feel we are so much ahead of were UT was.
Click to expand...

Not sure how you can honestly say that, optimistic is one thing, but acting as if we've seen something to suggest we're on track for sweet 16 or better seems a bit off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#155
#155
bleedingTNorange said:
Not sure how you can honestly say that, optimistic is one thing, but acting as if we've seen something to suggest we're on track for sweet 16 or better seems a bit off.
Click to expand...

dont think most thought we were on track for a sweet sixteen with or withoutnthe coaching change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#157
#157
HBCButch said:
It wont...and why are we all of a sudden like...going after 'sketchy' guys that cant make it? We haven't had this problem for the last 3-4 years...why now....will this be an ongoing problem....going after knuckleheads?
Click to expand...

in the last few years we went after sketchy guys who had no problem getting into school but couldn't compete in the SEC.
 
#160
#160
bleedingTNorange said:
Uhm we just appeared in one lol
Click to expand...

"On track" means expectations for the future, not looking back at what happened last year. Teams change every year, and I think it's pretty well conceded that we were going to be hurting for talent this year.

Also, you're the one who brought up the sweet sixteen. "On track" could mean playing with energy and determination instead of whatever we've been watching the last few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#162
#162
bleedingTNorange said:
Not sure how you can honestly say that, optimistic is one thing, but acting as if we've seen something to suggest we're on track for sweet 16 or better seems a bit off.
Click to expand...

The Delusionals will be the first suggesting the axe 10 games in. Never changes around here.
 
#163
#163
so now a last years sweet 16 team with 2 nba players leaving and no big man left on the team was on track for another run with Martin? And we would've been relying on a couple of quitters for that run?

That's funny. Delusional but funny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#172
#172
bleedingTNorange said:
Lmao you're being delusional, Tennessee will probably be picked around 6-7 in the SEC at best, and that's assuming Mostella and McKnight are cleared.
Click to expand...

yeah it has a chancevto be a really difficult yr with how thin we are up front. It depends on how well CDT can hide our weaknesses.
 
#174
#174
bleedingTNorange said:
If Mostella and McKnight are cleared I would set the O/U on wins at 17.5
Click to expand...

i definitely think that or better is possible but the thin front court will still be a concern but i have seen coaches(especially that run a system similar to CDT) perform well in similar situations.
 
#175
#175
volbeast33 said:
i definitely think that or better is possible but the thin front court will still be a concern but i have seen coaches(especially that run a system similar to CDT) perform well in similar situations.
Click to expand...

Like? I can't remember many successful teams with sub 200lbs bigs, but I very well could be wrong.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top