bleedingTNorange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 75,525
- Likes
- 56,188
Number 3 would be a fun lineupI've said it once, but I'll say it again. If Mostella starts from Day 1, it means one of three things.
-One, that he is starting at SG in a traditional lineup over Hubbs. Doubtful IMO.
-Two, that he is starting at PG in a traditional lineup over Chiles. Again, doubtful unless Chiles is slow to return from injury, and Tyndall sees Mostella as our next best option at PG.
-Three, that he is starting at SG in a 4-guard lineup of Chiles, Mostella, Hubbs, Richardson, and one of McKnight/Owens/McGhee. This is the most likely scenario, IMO, for Mostella to start from Day 1.
I've said it once, but I'll say it again. If Mostella starts from Day 1, it means one of three things.
-One, that he is starting at SG in a traditional lineup over Hubbs. Doubtful IMO.
-Two, that he is starting at PG in a traditional lineup over Chiles. Again, doubtful unless Chiles is slow to return from injury, and Tyndall sees Mostella as our next best option at PG.
-Three, that he is starting at SG in a 4-guard lineup of Chiles, Mostella, Hubbs, Richardson, and one of McKnight/Owens/McGhee. This is the most likely scenario, IMO, for Mostella to start from Day 1.
Sparty was a Dooley supporter so.....
As I was for Martin, pearl, oneill, buzz, wade, green, devoe, majors, fulmer, kiffin, and now Butch and tyndall.
I support them all until I decide I don't want to anymore. If that's hard to understand, text one of your teenage buddies, maybe they can help you out.
Duh? You don't think we have a team already without Mostella and McKnight? Did you not even read this regarding the post? It's a little strange to toss the season in the trash for two players who are not even on the roster. We easily have enough players to go 10 deep. Chris Dortch » Vols may be thin in the post, but they will reboundMcKnight is just as important as Mostella. Need both from day 1 to have any chance at post season.