TOP
unconventional
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2009
- Messages
- 26,776
- Likes
- 1,876
I'm going to comment on a past player and their overall history but feel free to throw out current underrated players in terms of around the league.
Anyways...
I knew Sam Cassell was a pretty good player but I guess I never realized how good his numbers actually were. Maybe it won't come as a surprise to others and they won't find the numbers very impressive or maybe they knew he was that good but when you think of Sam Cassell, do you think...
30.0mpg 15.7pts 6.0asts 3.2rebs 1.1stl
45.4%fg 33.1%3pt 86.1%ft
I don't know why but those numbers shock me and they're even weighed down quite a bit by his early seasons and later seasons. I remember thinking he was really good with Ray Allen and Glen Robinson on the Bucks but after looking at season by season, his numbers are mind blowing.
75gms 19.6pts 8.0asts 3.1rebs 1.6stls 44.1%
81gms 18.6pts 9.0asts 3.8rebs 1.3stls 46.6%
76gms 18.2pts 7.6asts 3.8rebs 1.2stls 47.4%
74gms 19.7pts 6.7asts 4.2rebs 1.2stls 46.3%
78gms 19.7pts 5.8asts 4.4rebs 1.1stls 47.0%
81gms 19.8pts 7.3asts 3.3rebs 1.3stls 48.8%
78gms 17.2pts 6.3asts 3.7rebs 0.9stls 44.3%
Is there anyone who knew he had that many good seasons? Again, I remember him being a good player but not that good. Those numbers blow my mind. Steve Nash's MVP numbers for instance...
75gms 15.5pts 11.5asts 3.4rebs 1.0stls 50.2%
79gms 18.8pts 10.5asts 4.2rebs 0.8stls 51.2%
Now compare Cassell, Nash and Kidd's career numbers...
Cassell 6'3" 193lbs - 1993 24th overall
30.0mpg 15.7pts 6.0asts 3.2rebs 1.1stl
45.4%fg 33.1%3pt 86.1%ft
Nash 6'3" 178lbs - 1996 15th overall
31.4mpg 14.5pts 8.6asts 3.0rebs 0.7stls
49.1%fg 42.8%3pt 90.4%ft
Kidd - 6'4" 210lbs - 1994 2nd overall
36.6mpg 13.0pts 9.0asts 6.4rebs 1.9stls
40.1%fg 34.9%3pt 78.4%ft
Maybe it's just me but damn, as quality of player as I thought Cassell was, I didn't realize he was that good. So does anyone else agree he's underrated or did I just block out how good he was and it's common knowledge he was averaging like 20-7-4 while shooting 47% over the course of 7 seasons?
Anyways...
I knew Sam Cassell was a pretty good player but I guess I never realized how good his numbers actually were. Maybe it won't come as a surprise to others and they won't find the numbers very impressive or maybe they knew he was that good but when you think of Sam Cassell, do you think...
30.0mpg 15.7pts 6.0asts 3.2rebs 1.1stl
45.4%fg 33.1%3pt 86.1%ft
I don't know why but those numbers shock me and they're even weighed down quite a bit by his early seasons and later seasons. I remember thinking he was really good with Ray Allen and Glen Robinson on the Bucks but after looking at season by season, his numbers are mind blowing.
75gms 19.6pts 8.0asts 3.1rebs 1.6stls 44.1%
81gms 18.6pts 9.0asts 3.8rebs 1.3stls 46.6%
76gms 18.2pts 7.6asts 3.8rebs 1.2stls 47.4%
74gms 19.7pts 6.7asts 4.2rebs 1.2stls 46.3%
78gms 19.7pts 5.8asts 4.4rebs 1.1stls 47.0%
81gms 19.8pts 7.3asts 3.3rebs 1.3stls 48.8%
78gms 17.2pts 6.3asts 3.7rebs 0.9stls 44.3%
Is there anyone who knew he had that many good seasons? Again, I remember him being a good player but not that good. Those numbers blow my mind. Steve Nash's MVP numbers for instance...
75gms 15.5pts 11.5asts 3.4rebs 1.0stls 50.2%
79gms 18.8pts 10.5asts 4.2rebs 0.8stls 51.2%
Now compare Cassell, Nash and Kidd's career numbers...
Cassell 6'3" 193lbs - 1993 24th overall
30.0mpg 15.7pts 6.0asts 3.2rebs 1.1stl
45.4%fg 33.1%3pt 86.1%ft
Nash 6'3" 178lbs - 1996 15th overall
31.4mpg 14.5pts 8.6asts 3.0rebs 0.7stls
49.1%fg 42.8%3pt 90.4%ft
Kidd - 6'4" 210lbs - 1994 2nd overall
36.6mpg 13.0pts 9.0asts 6.4rebs 1.9stls
40.1%fg 34.9%3pt 78.4%ft
Maybe it's just me but damn, as quality of player as I thought Cassell was, I didn't realize he was that good. So does anyone else agree he's underrated or did I just block out how good he was and it's common knowledge he was averaging like 20-7-4 while shooting 47% over the course of 7 seasons?