I saw that they had Memphis, Kansas, North Carolina/Duke, and UCLA. UCLA won by one today over Cal and only led 3 minutes of that game and only beat Stanford by one and trailing most of that game. How can you be a former #1, have beaten a # 1 on the road, currently be ranked # 4, #1 in RPI, and #2 in strength of schedule and not be a number 1 seed. I'm not saying that ESPN doesn't like us but if you showed the talking heads the resumes of the top 8 teams and took away the names beside the teams so they wouldn't know who was who, Tennessee would probably be the 2nd number 1 seed selected. This pisses me off really bad and I don't know how the committee could get away with not giving us a number 1 if we take care of business. Hell, we were a number 2 seed two years ago and we are in much, much better shape than we were then. Can someone else explain to me how we weren't mentioned as a number 1 seed and Kansas was a unanimous choice by all 4 of the heads. Look at UCLA's resume and tell me that they have proven themselves more than we have. It's a joke that we aren't on there.