- Joined
- Nov 23, 2012
- Messages
- 77,929
- Likes
- 116,018
I guess I should clarify that I distinguish between nationalism and patriotism. Also, yes, nationalism can be rational in the sense that it allows for greater strength in numbers, assessing one's state of affairs, determining what will work best for their nation (or even themselves in some cases) vis a vis the international community, and acting upon this determination. In that sense, yes, nationalism is rational and even moral, I suppose. So, I overstated things a bit in my earlier post.
Nonetheless, nationalism can be incredibly irrational. And, indeed, I would argue it (along with ethnocentrism as a smaller-scale version) has contributed to the majority of the world's wars since at least the mid-1800s. I think we'd all be better off with a little less nationalism and a little more patriotism.
Perhaps, but without nationalism, we wouldn't have won WWII, landed on the moon, created the Bill of Rights (even as it's shredded these days) or any number of things that will stand for all time as our greatest accomplishments.
Nationalism can be a rapier that selects the parts it hits or the broadsword that hacks away randomly. It all depends on the application.
