here ya go....read on this for a couple days til you possibly understand it..
NCAA policy on forfeits and vacancies
Generally
The NCAA has promulgated a formal policy on forfeits and vacancies. The policy describes the differences between the two sanctions, and how records of affected schools should be revised when such sanctions are imposed. In addition, the NCAA policy explicitly states that the NCAA will not change official records until a penalty has been ruled on by the NCAA Committee on Infractions.
In the case of a forfeit, the penalized team's win becomes a loss and the opponent's loss is changed to a win. In the words of the NCAA, "This affects season records, all-time records and coaches' records, and should be changed whenever and wherever these records are referred. Except for any student-athletes declared ineligible, the individual statistics are not affected by this action." The treatment of forfeits is straightforward and symmetrical and is easily noted in reports of official records. Accordingly other than urging editors to ensure that forfeited matches are properly noted where pertinent (for example, the policy includes "forfeit scores" to be recorded in each sport), forfeits are not discussed herein. Vacancies, however, may be reflected in the official records in a variety of ways.
Regular season vacancies
In the case of regular season games, the penalized team's win is removed from its official NCAA record. The losing team, however, retains the loss, and individual statistics resulting from the subject game(s) are not affected other than for players declared specifically ineligible. These changes affect the penalized team's season records, all-time records and coaches' records. Thus for example, a team that was 10-2 during a season in which it fielded ineligible players would have its record revised to 0-2. Any team or coach streaks (e.g. wins, postseason appearances, team statistical streaks) are terminated. The NCAA prescribes that all records that are changed should be asterisked with the footnote stating something to the effect of Later vacated by NCAA action.
and furthermore
Anomalies and their resolution
By striking the win but not the corresponding loss in official records relating to regular season games, the NCAA policy results in a variety of anomalies, such as games of record that have losers but not winners, and series records between individual teams that differ depending on the team from whose perspective the series is described (the penalized team's all-time record not reflecting games that still appear in the opponent's).
The NCAA does not officially track series win-loss records, and has no policy for the treatment of vacated victories in such records. However, in 2009, at least three media reports discussing NCAA sanctions against the Alabama Crimson Tide football program stated that games with vacated wins are not counted at all in a series record between 2 teams.[4][5][6] While two of these reports are of uncertain reliability and do not establish or reflect an official NCAA position on the question, they are consistent with one another and thus as of the time of this essay would appear to reflect a consensus about how to reflect vacated wins in head-to-head series records. Omitting the game entirely in series records will not reflect the won-lost series records of either of the individual teams separately, and the method cannot be squared with the NCAA's express policy that only the win, and not the loss, is stricken. Nevertheless under the NCAA's asymmetrical method of recording vacated wins, inconsistencies cannot be avoided altogether and it is the consensus of the editors that treating "vacated wins" as wholly "vacated contests" for purposes of series records, when properly annotated, is cleaner, more concise and more easily understood than posting separate series records from each team's point of view; and that, barring contradictory statements from the NCAA or other reliable sources, series records should be reflected in that fashion.
