It's not a secret that good coaches coaching good teams can lose games they should win.
Problem with comparing Dooley to them? He hasn't won a major game to offset a subpar performance yet either at UT or even previously in his tenure. If he beats LSU pretty much any/all doubt about where he has this team going will be quieted for the time being. Saban had more notches in his belt at the end of his first year at Bama that it didn't really matter if he lost to ULM. Him beating Tennessee would have been the equivalent to Dooley beating Florida give or take the rank at the time of the game.
Even beating Georgia would be a triumph, though not on the level that Florida, Alabama or LSU would be.
There was also the Memphis game in 1996.
But you can name any coach who ever lived, and I can name a game where they sucked.
Bear Bryant in 1981 lost a game to a 1-10 Georgia Tech team. Cost him a shot at another national championship.
Many years before that, Darrell Royal served up Bear's first national title when his No. 1-ranked Texas team managed to get beat by 1-8 TCU late in the season.
Tom Osborne in 1992 lost a game--badly--to a 2-9 Iowa State team that had just lost by two TDs to 1-AA Northern Iowa.
Nick Saban in his first season at LSU lost to UAB. In his first season at Alabama, he lost to ULM.
One of Pete Carroll's semi-pro USC teams lost a game to Stanford in which they were favored by 40.
Even Steve Spurrier had the "Choke at Doak," not to mention a loss to a big underdog most seasons that took his team out of the national title picture.
You can say Derek Dooley sucked on Saturday, but at least he still won the game.
hmmm.. I really don't remember spurrier losing to big underdog teams every year at FL. I can't remember him losing to many if any unranked teams during his time there
And, he had a successful coaching record prior to taking either job. Dooley is not Saban.