QuickSmurf
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2013
- Messages
- 3,962
- Likes
- 3,063
Tee was the playcaller on 1st and 2nd downs, Tyson on 3rd downs...which was our weakness. Doesn't mean Tyson's playcalling wouldn't fit Vol's scheme and players.
Coach Helton stepped away from offensive play calling, turned it over to those two in order to be more involved as a HC for the entire team. Maybe y'all didn't notice, since you don't watch our games, but every time our defense took the ball away from opposing offenses, they ran to the sidelines to hand the ball to their HC, not the referees. Every single time. That's how much CCH was involved with the entire team.
That is literally the dumbest thing I have ever heard and if true everyone on the entire USC staff should be fired just for coming up with such a stupid scheme. Let me get this straight, Tee is a genius coordinator on downs 1-2 but instantly has the IQ of a banana on third which is the most critical down? Tyson is a bumbling idiot but is given play calling duties on the most crucial down yet is terrible at it? Clay Helton is an offensive mastermind yet willfully allows two lesser coaches run his offense even though he doesnt fully trust either of them?
It does matter to a degree. A pro style offense is not an offense that is as well suited to beat teams like Alabama and Georgia as a spread offense, ceteris paribus. It relies a lot on having more talent than the other team. Spread offenses do a better job of masking being a less talented team. But being uptemp helps with that as well. It can be successful here, but those are the facts of the matter.
The fact is we don't know what the Helton offense o play calling is like. He has never had his own offense or called plays for someone else's offense on any downs.
Pretty much the case for any offensive minded head coaches but he has been an offensive coordinator at some capacity for two different head coaches so there is no doubt in my mind that he learned a few things from both situations