Tyson Helton Offense

#77
#77
Devo182 said:
I'd agree, but this wasn't his offense either. I hope he takes more from Brohm than Tee. WKU was putting up 44+ when he was there learning under Brohm.
Click to expand...

One thing you can say for certain, the Brohm's know offense. Both brothers offenses have been prolific. I'd definitely hope leans that direction. While the pass game gets a lot of their shine, they are also fans of very successful power run games. I think think is going to be a very solid offense.
 
#78
#78
SpaceCoastVol said:
.. and big tight ends across the middle for 4 or 5 yards when needed
Click to expand...

I definitely miss seeing our TE's being bigger parts of the offense. All the mismatches that Witten created over the years was fun to watch. Not to mention you couldn't just focus on the receivers. That '01 team had numerous NFL receivers like Stallworth, Eric Parker and Kelly Washington then the stable of RB's we had then you have Jason Witten running down the middle of the field all by himself. Our offense in 2001 would have created mismatch problems for any team in the country. Then throw in thecNFL talent on defense. I really don't have any idea how Fulmer lost any games that season much less 2 losses. Still the biggest choke job in the history of my Vol Football watching life.
 
#80
#80
jasonvol18 said:
No it is not. Tee may call some of the plays but the Offense is 100% Helton's. I don't know how much leeway Tee has in playcalling but I guarantee very little gets called without it going through Clay first. Tee has very little of his handprints on USC's offense. It's Helton's offense from top to bottom.
Click to expand...

Tee was the playcaller on 1st and 2nd downs, Tyson on 3rd downs...which was our weakness. Doesn't mean Tyson's playcalling wouldn't fit Vol's scheme and players.

Coach Helton stepped away from offensive play calling, turned it over to those two in order to be more involved as a HC for the entire team. Maybe y'all didn't notice, since you don't watch our games, but every time our defense took the ball away from opposing offenses, they ran to the sidelines to hand the ball to their HC, not the referees. Every single time. That's how much CCH was involved with the entire team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#83
#83
Trojan Princess said:
Tee was the playcaller on 1st and 2nd downs, Tyson on 3rd downs...which was our weakness.
Click to expand...

I find this a little bit funny. If the play calling and execution were good on 1st/2nd down, this might not have been as much of an issue.

I would venture to say calling plays on 3rd down is more difficult than 1st or 2nd down as there is more pressure to convert and run/pass is easier for a defense to predict based on distance needed.

To me, it seems like Helton was given (or trusted with) a more difficult task than Tee. Why would this be the case?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#84
#84
VolZen said:
I find this a little bit funny. If the play calling and execution were good on 1st/2nd down, this might not have been as much of an issue.

I would venture to say calling plays on 3rd down is more difficult than 1st or 2nd down as there is more pressure to convert and run/pass is easier for a defense to predict based on distance needed.

To me, it seems like Helton was given (or trusted with) a more difficult task than Tee. Why would this be the case?
Click to expand...

And it seems if there was a significant drop off in the play calling between Tee on 1st and 2nd down and Tyson on 3rd down why wouldn’t they allow Tee to do it all?

Sounds like Trojan butt hurt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#85
#85
VolZen said:
I find this a little bit funny. If the play calling and execution were good on 1st/2nd down, this might not have been as much of an issue.

I would venture to say calling plays on 3rd down is more difficult than 1st or 2nd down as there is more pressure to convert and run/pass is easier for a defense to predict based on distance needed.

To me, it seems like Helton was given (or trusted with) a more difficult task than Tee. Why would this be the case?
Click to expand...

illvol said:
And it seems if there was a significant drop off in the play calling between Tee on 1st and 2nd down and Tyson on 3rd down why wouldn’t they allow Tee to do it all?

Sounds like Trojan butt hurt.
Click to expand...

Helton never called third down plays anyway. His brother said it, the guys covering the hire said it. He has never called plays. He just had some input like the pgc has at every school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#87
#87
tennfanatic said:
Haven't had a chance to see USC play this year. Does Tyson Helton run a pro or spread offense?
Click to expand...

:lolabove: :eek:lol: :lolabove: :eek:lol:

He runs a modified trips shotgun pro slant wing T!! :thud:


If this staff is any where close to good, they will access what talent they have on the field. Coach them, work them and put them on the field in position to be successful. That is the system they need to run.

Ya gonna have to run with what ya got for a couple of years. Ya don't ram rod a system that doesn't have the talent run it.

And for good measure, I don't care what they run. I just wanna see them run.....fast and hit some one!!
 
#92
#92
Trojan Princess said:
Tee was the playcaller on 1st and 2nd downs, Tyson on 3rd downs...which was our weakness. Doesn't mean Tyson's playcalling wouldn't fit Vol's scheme and players.

Coach Helton stepped away from offensive play calling, turned it over to those two in order to be more involved as a HC for the entire team. Maybe y'all didn't notice, since you don't watch our games, but every time our defense took the ball away from opposing offenses, they ran to the sidelines to hand the ball to their HC, not the referees. Every single time. That's how much CCH was involved with the entire team.
Click to expand...

Toya, is that you?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top