TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#9,976
#9,976
lawgator1 said:
I do think that it is fair to ask the next SCt nominee that he/she agree to recuse themselves if any issue comes up in a Trump case, i.e. whether he can be indicted or forced to testify to the grand jury.


I expect they might not answer, but I think in turn that it would justify a no vote in confirmation hearings.
Click to expand...

Agree if Ginsburg does the same
 
#9,977
#9,977
volfanjustin said:
Agree if Ginsburg does the same
Click to expand...


She is already on the Court. Plus, she would not be beholden to Trump, who insists on loyalty agreements, for her seat. A new nominee would doubtless have been cornered on such a pledge, one way or another, by the Trump Mafia.
 
#9,978
#9,978
lawgator1 said:
She is already on the Court. Plus, she would not be beholden to Trump, who insists on loyalty agreements, for her seat. A new nominee would doubtless have been cornered on such a pledge, one way or another, by the Trump Mafia.
Click to expand...

God, you have lost all sense of reason.........
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#9,979
#9,979
lawgator1 said:
She is already on the Court. Plus, she would not be beholden to Trump, who insists on loyalty agreements, for her seat. A new nominee would doubtless have been cornered on such a pledge, one way or another, by the Trump Mafia.
Click to expand...

No but she has proven she has a bias against the President

"He is a faker. He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. ... How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that ….

"At first I thought it was funny," she said of Trump's early candidacy. "To think that there's a possibility that he could be president …
Click to expand...

"I can’t imagine what this place would be — I can’t imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president. For the country, it could be four years. For the court, it could be — I don’t even want to contemplate that.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,982
#9,982
volfanjustin said:
No but she has proven she has a bias against the President
Click to expand...




So what? Those comments could as easily have come from McConnell, Rubio, Cruz, Ryan, or even Melania.


The Justices are human. They are going to have opinions of Trump, or anyone else for that matter, that comes before them. There is an enormous difference between that and having to sit in judgment of the person that gave you the very job that has you sitting in judgment of them.
 
#9,983
#9,983
lawgator1 said:
So what? Those comments could as easily have come from McConnell, Rubio, Cruz, Ryan, or even Melania.


The Justices are human. They are going to have opinions of Trump, or anyone else for that matter, that comes before them. There is an enormous difference between that and having to sit in judgment of the person that gave you the very job that has you sitting in judgment of them.
Click to expand...

You do realize how big of an insult this statement is to a SCJ.........nevermind, LG being LG......
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9,984
#9,984
lawgator1 said:
So what? Those comments could as easily have come from McConnell, Rubio, Cruz, Ryan, or even Melania.

The Justices are human. They are going to have opinions of Trump, or anyone else for that matter, that comes before them. There is an enormous difference between that and having to sit in judgment of the person that gave you the very job that has you sitting in judgment of them.
Click to expand...

Hmmm

Perhaps they should keep those thoughts to themselves if they are on the SCOTUS? You know, the neutral and unbiased SCOTUS?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#9,988
#9,988
Grand Vol said:
Hmmm

Perhaps they should keep those thoughts to themselves if they are on the SCOTUS? You know, the neutral and unbiased SCOTUS?
Click to expand...




I agree with you on that.


I'm just saying that the fact that she is outspoken about her dislike for him is not as significant a problem as having someone take a job from Trump today, then make a decision as to Trump's own future tomorrow.


Meanwhile, it is interesting that we've heard nothing about Trump doing a sit down with Mueller or being subpoenaed to the grand jury. Rudy upped his meds and has otherwise been kept under wraps.


You get the sense that there is a lot of positioning going on and that we are going to see something major very soon, one way or the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,989
#9,989
lawgator1 said:
I agree with you on that.


I'm just saying that the fact that she is outspoken about her dislike for him is not as significant a problem as having someone take a job from Trump today, then make a decision as to Trump's own future tomorrow.


Meanwhile, it is interesting that we've heard nothing about Trump doing a sit down with Mueller or being subpoenaed to the grand jury. Rudy upped his meds and has otherwise been kept under wraps.


You get the sense that there is a lot of positioning going on and that we are going to see something major very soon, one way or the other.
Click to expand...

soon......
 
#9,990
#9,990
lawgator1 said:
You get the sense that there is a lot of positioning going on and that we are going to see something major very soon, one way or the other.
Click to expand...

Your side will never accept the outcome if they find nothing.

I just hope the bloodshed from the riots your side will start is over quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,991
#9,991
ABC News’ Brian Ross — who was suspended last year as chief investigative correspondent for a faulty report on Michael Flynn — is leaving the network, Page Six has exclusively learned.

ABC suspended Ross last December for a month without pay for a botched report on ousted White House national security adviser Flynn that reported President Trump directed Flynn to make contact with Russian officials. The mistake even sent stocks tumbling, and ABC issued an apology saying: “We deeply regret and apologize for the serious error.”

We hear that Ross on Monday announced he’s leaving the network. His longtime executive producer Rhonda Schwartz is also exiting. “The time has come to say good-bye,” said the duo in a letter to staff with an announcement by ABC News president James Goldston.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,992
#9,992
Franklin Pierce said:
ABC News’ Brian Ross — who was suspended last year as chief investigative correspondent for a faulty report on Michael Flynn — is leaving the network, Page Six has exclusively learned.

ABC suspended Ross last December for a month without pay for a botched report on ousted White House national security adviser Flynn that reported President Trump directed Flynn to make contact with Russian officials. The mistake even sent stocks tumbling, and ABC issued an apology saying: “We deeply regret and apologize for the serious error.”

We hear that Ross on Monday announced he’s leaving the network. His longtime executive producer Rhonda Schwartz is also exiting. “The time has come to say good-bye,” said the duo in a letter to staff with an announcement by ABC News president James Goldston.
Click to expand...



Good. There's no place for sloppy inaccurate reporting on this issue.






















Which means all of Fox's team are resigning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,994
#9,994
lawgator1 said:
I agree with you on that.


I'm just saying that the fact that she is outspoken about her dislike for him is not as significant a problem as having someone take a job from Trump today, then make a decision as to Trump's own future tomorrow.


Meanwhile, it is interesting that we've heard nothing about Trump doing a sit down with Mueller or being subpoenaed to the grand jury. Rudy upped his meds and has otherwise been kept under wraps.


You get the sense that there is a lot of positioning going on and that we are going to see something major very soon, one way or the other.
Click to expand...

so time to preemptively start the End of the End PutinGate4?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9,998
#9,998
Franklin Pierce said:
ABC News’ Brian Ross — who was suspended last year as chief investigative correspondent for a faulty report on Michael Flynn — is leaving the network, Page Six has exclusively learned.

ABC suspended Ross last December for a month without pay for a botched report on ousted White House national security adviser Flynn that reported President Trump directed Flynn to make contact with Russian officials. The mistake even sent stocks tumbling, and ABC issued an apology saying: “We deeply regret and apologize for the serious error.”

We hear that Ross on Monday announced he’s leaving the network. His longtime executive producer Rhonda Schwartz is also exiting. “The time has come to say good-bye,” said the duo in a letter to staff with an announcement by ABC News president James Goldston.
Click to expand...

Imagine if all reporters and their editors and management were made to understand that facts matter, and even more so that a true balanced news report has to include fact that they personally would rather bury. Won't happen though because opinion has replaced reason, and libs are gonna liberate the news.
 
#9,999
#9,999
AM64 said:
Imagine if all reporters and their editors and management were made to understand that facts matter, and even more so that a true balanced news report has to include fact that they personally would rather bury. Won't happen though because opinion has replaced reason, and libs are gonna liberate the news.
Click to expand...

Repubs. have already liberated the news with alternative facts.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top