TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

[BowlBrother85]

Maybe they will find out that Manafort is illegal like Obama, and drop all charges.

Maybe they will find out why Manafort was tampering with witnesses?

 

[Hayezb]

Manafort is probably having the time of his life right now, anyway... He just looks like the kind of inmate who would "keep the backdoor at the rear of the property unlocked" ... if you know what I mean.

You homophobic pig. When they go low we go high!

 

[Orange_Crush]

Manafort is probably having the time of his life right now, anyway... He just looks like the kind of inmate who would "keep the backdoor at the rear of the property unlocked" ... if you know what I mean.

Classy.

 

[1972 Grad]

You homophobic pig. When they go low we go high!

Wonder what First Tennessee Bank thinks about homophobic posting?

 

[Orange_Crush]

Wonder what First Tennessee Bank thinks about homophobic posting?

Democratic Socialists on their way to tell all 1st Tennessees that they don't deserve peace until they uncover the identity of the homophobe among them and feed him to sharks with lasers on their head.

 

[evillawyer]

This is pretty big news if true. Cambridge Analytica having these a month in advance of any public release is pretty damning for the Trump campaign.

Trump Campaign Data Firm Got Hacked Clinton Emails ‘A Month’ Before WikiLeaks, Mueller May Know, Report Says

 

[Mick]

This is pretty big news if true. Cambridge Analytica having these a month in advance of any public release is pretty damning for the Trump campaign.

Trump Campaign Data Firm Got Hacked Clinton Emails ‘A Month’ Before WikiLeaks, Mueller May Know, Report Says

Oh well.

 

[Grand Vol]

This is pretty big news if true. Cambridge Analytica having these a month in advance of any public release is pretty damning for the Trump campaign.

Trump Campaign Data Firm Got Hacked Clinton Emails ‘A Month’ Before WikiLeaks, Mueller May Know, Report Says

Lol

And you complain about right wing conspiracy theory sites.

 

[evillawyer]

Lol

And you complain about right wing conspiracy theory sites.

Notice the qualifier "if true"? I fully admit this is pretty thinly sourced at this point. My degree of belief is adjusted accordingly.

 

[evillawyer]

Here's the spectator article originally reporting the CA nugget. Don't know their track record.

What does the British government know about Trump and Russia? | The Spectator

 

[volinbham]

Here's what I can figure as the source of the information

“An American lawyer I know told me that he was approached by a Cambridge Analytica employee after the election,” Wood wrote, as quoted by Raw Story. “They had had the Clinton emails more than a month before they were published by WikiLeaks: ‘What should I do?’ Take this to Mueller, the lawyer replied.”

The author claims a lawyer he knows told him (author) that he (lawyer) was approached by a CA employee who made the claim.

Not saying it's not true but it's an unnamed source using an unnamed source.

 

[evillawyer]

Here's what I can figure as the source of the information



The author claims a lawyer he knows told him (author) that he (lawyer) was approached by a CA employee who made the claim.

Not saying it's not true but it's an unnamed source using an unnamed source.

We're discussing this in the child separation thread as well. I admit it's thinly sourced at this point. But wow, if true, this is really incriminating for team Trump.

 

[Grand Vol]

We're discussing this in the child separation thread as well. I admit it's thinly sourced at this point. But wow, if true, this is really incriminating for team Trump.

I've got some great ocean front property in Oklahoma to sell you...

 

[evillawyer]

I've got some great ocean front property in Oklahoma to sell you...

Does it come with corporate favors from Inhofe and Pruitt?

 

[Orange_Crush]

I've got some great ocean front property in Oklahoma to sell you...

I thought it was Arizona.

 

[Grand Vol]

I thought it was Arizona.

No, I sold that to LG a month ago.

 

[evillawyer]

Here's the spectator article originally reporting the CA nugget. Don't know their track record.

What does the British government know about Trump and Russia? | The Spectator

The author appears to be well-regarded.

Paul Wood (journalist - Wikipedia)

 

[volinbham]

We're discussing this in the child separation thread as well. I admit it's thinly sourced at this point. But wow, if true, this is really incriminating for team Trump.

It could be incriminating depending on many factors one of which is how did they come to be in possession and another being what was done with it. There are more factors of course.

This all hinges too on whether it has any truth.

 

[ajvol01]

This is pretty big news if true. Cambridge Analytica having these a month in advance of any public release is pretty damning for the Trump campaign.

Trump Campaign Data Firm Got Hacked Clinton Emails ‘A Month’ Before WikiLeaks, Mueller May Know, Report Says

I thought Wikileaks was working for Russia?

I thought that was part of the whole Russian collusion narrative?

Now what is it? British collusion?

 

[Mick]

I thought Wikileaks was working for Russia?

I thought that was part of the whole Russian collusion narrative?

Now what is it? British collusion?

If true It means Cambridge Analytic was part of the conspiracy with Russia.

 

[evillawyer]

I thought Wikileaks was working for Russia?

I thought that was part of the whole Russian collusion narrative?

Now what is it? British collusion?

Here's the theory for you. It would be impossible for team Trump to make of use of the emails directly because that would raise immediate suspicion as to how they got them. If released through an unaffiliated entity, like WikiLeaks, it's easy to say "we're just making use of what WikiLeaks released to the world at large." However, if it's established--and it's far from being established (right now we got one solitary claim from an unnamed source)--that Cambridge Analytica (which was retained by Trump) had these emails a month in advance, Trump's role in the hacking--or at least his willing acceptance of the fruit of the hack--becomes much harder to deny.

 

[BigOrangeTrain]

Here's the theory for you. It would be impossible for team Trump to make of use of the emails directly because that would raise immediate suspicion as to how they got them. If released through an unaffiliated entity, like WikiLeaks, it's easy to say "we're just making use of what WikiLeaks released to the world at large." However, if it's established--and it's far from being established (right now we got one solitary claim from an unnamed source)--that Cambridge Analytica (which was retained by Trump) had these emails a month in advance, Trump's role in the hacking--or at least his willing acceptance of the fruit of the hack--becomes much harder to deny.

Tin foil hats

 

[evillawyer]

Robert Mueller accuses New York Times, WashPost of inaccurate reports - Business Insider

Some red meat for you guys

 

[SLICKYINC]

Robert Mueller accuses New York Times, WashPost of inaccurate reports - Business Insider

Some red meat for you guys

That's not red meat. We don't need Muellers confirmation on what we already know.

 

[volinbham]

Here's the theory for you. It would be impossible for team Trump to make of use of the emails directly because that would raise immediate suspicion as to how they got them. If released through an unaffiliated entity, like WikiLeaks, it's easy to say "we're just making use of what WikiLeaks released to the world at large." However, if it's established--and it's far from being established (right now we got one solitary claim from an unnamed source)--that Cambridge Analytica (which was retained by Trump) had these emails a month in advance, Trump's role in the hacking--or at least his willing acceptance of the fruit of the hack--becomes much harder to deny.

To clarify - the claim is not that they had them before Wikileaks had them; it is they had them before Wikileaks publicly released them.