OuterBanksVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2011
- Messages
- 3,064
- Likes
- 5,138
True. But if he fires with malicious intent, there can be repercussions. In this case, obstruction of justice probably.
True. But if he fires with malicious intent, there can be repercussions. In this case, obstruction of justice probably.
I think he might, and that will go down as his best firing of all time.
Never give up the dream Luth. So 18 months I think was your timeline and youve quadrupled down in that. So mid July when hes still in office have you established what type bread and fixings you like on your crow sandwich?😂
anything is possible but these threads are full of people who bought the collusion thing hook, line and sinker - haven't seen any admit they got that one wrong.
plenty have bought the obstruction of justice narrative but that one too is looking weak.
Reading comprehension is hard. The big difference in these scenarios is a smoking gun. Still waiting...
There's a whole basket full of loons here who have bought that nonsense: LG, Luth, Septic, OBV, Mick just to name a few.
It's pretty entertaining, though!
clearly logic on your part is hard. What part of obstruction of justice do you not understand when trump admits that he fired an underling because of the russia investigation? anyone that doesn't believe that mueller will report that obstruction occurred is naive. Adequate evidence to impeach is already common public knowledge.