TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#4,552
#4,552
OuterBanksVol said:
Some former Trump campaign staffer named Nunberg has been subpoenaed by Mueller but... get this... Nunberg says he's not going to cooperate - plans to be a no show before the Grand Jury and won't provide the requested documents.

So... contempt of court = Mueller arrests his ass and let's him sit in jail until he does what he's told.

This should be amusing. I give the guy 48 hours max until he begs to cooperate. What a fool.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...c9f29a55815_story.html?utm_term=.e9b65ff8afd0
Click to expand...

Good, more need to do this. This way Muller will need to explain to a judge WHY.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,553
#4,553
luthervol said:
No but directing a subordinate to lie is directing a subordinate to lie. Pleading the 5th so you do not have to admit that you were directed to lie is what is happening.
Click to expand...

#
images
 
#4,554
#4,554
luthervol said:
Nah, I'm good.

Over 100 Charges, 19 People and 3 Companies: The Mueller Inquiry, Explained - The New York Times

In the nine months since Robert S. Mueller III was appointed to oversee the investigation into possible links between the Trump campaign and Russian officials, he has issued more than 100 criminal counts against 19 people and three companies. Of the 19 people, five — including three Trump associates — have pleaded guilty. Thirteen are Russians accused of meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
Click to expand...

Give me the freedom to investigate that Mueller has been given and the resources and I'd have charges all over you and your friends.... your friend's friend's and what not.....
 
#4,556
#4,556
hog88 said:
First there would have to be wrong doing.

Second our prisons would be full of federal employees if we used such loose interpretations as that.
Click to expand...

Trump instructed his subordinates to lie about the Trump Hotel meeting which was held with known Russian operatives for the expressed intent of getting damaging information on Clinton.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#4,558
#4,558
luthervol said:
Nah, I'm good.

Over 100 Charges, 19 People and 3 Companies: The Mueller Inquiry, Explained - The New York Times

In the nine months since Robert S. Mueller III was appointed to oversee the investigation into possible links between the Trump campaign and Russian officials, he has issued more than 100 criminal counts against 19 people and three companies. Of the 19 people, five — including three Trump associates — have pleaded guilty. Thirteen are Russians accused of meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
Click to expand...

lawgator1 said:
The Trump Army does not want to hear this. When they are accidentally exposed to facts, they deflect to something about a Clinton or Obama. They are the most intellectually dishonest political group in the history of the USA.
Click to expand...

LOL - the vast bulk of this is focused on the 13 Russians who according to the indictment were in no way connected to ANY Americans.

The rest are process crimes with 3 (yes only 3) Trump associates pleading guilty (to lying; not collusion or other crimes) and 1 who hasn't.

There is still no there there. Maybe it will come but to date this is tiny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#4,559
#4,559
Carl Pickens said:
Give me the freedom to investigate that Mueller has been given and the resources and I'd have charges all over you and your friends.... your friend's friend's and what not.....
Click to expand...

That's why I decided not to run for president.

Trump is guilty of far more than just the everyday minor infractions we would all commit at one time or another.

All Starr could dig up is Lewinsky. We'll see if Trump is as clean as Clinton.
 
#4,560
#4,560
luthervol said:
Trump instructed his subordinates to lie about the Trump Hotel meeting which was held with known Russian operatives for the expressed intent of getting damaging information on Clinton.
Click to expand...

Trump alledged instructions, thats not a crime.

Remind me how the foreign led dossier dirt from Russians is any different?
 
#4,561
#4,561
volinbham said:
LOL - the vast bulk of this is focused on the 13 Russians who according to the indictment were in no way connected to ANY Americans.

The rest are process crimes with 3 (yes only 3) Trump associates pleading guilty (to lying; not collusion or other crimes) and 1 who hasn't.

There is still no there there. Maybe it will come but to date this is tiny.
Click to expand...

What if it is proven that he instructed his subordinates to lie about the hotel meeting?
 
#4,562
#4,562
luthervol said:
That's why I decided not to run for president.

Trump is guilty of far more than just the everyday minor infractions we would all commit at one time or another.

All Starr could dig up is Lewinsky. We'll see if Trump is as clean as Clinton.
Click to expand...

His taste in women is far more clean than Clinton’s insatiable hunger for tubbies.
 
Last edited:
#4,564
#4,564
luthervol said:
Trump instructed his subordinates to lie about the Trump Hotel meeting which was held with known Russian operatives for the expressed intent of getting damaging information on Clinton.
Click to expand...

At worst he instructed them to lie to the press. Not a damn thing illegal about that.

Sorry Luther but you're barking up the wrong tree AGAIN.
 
#4,566
#4,566
When’s Mueller going to get all the texts and emails from HRC campaign, the DNC leaders, Perkins Coie, Fusion GPS, Steele, Blumenthal, Shearer, the Ohr’s , HRC cronies in the Obama administration...and what about this lil nelly, Chalupa (hmmm Ukraine, and Manafort, what was she really doing and with whom? )? OMG what a house of cards this ****show would be.:eek:lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,569
#4,569
Septic said:
Can you define screech, is it what we don't agree with? Also, if you have specifics of egregious examples of military waste - I'd be happy to screech about that to.

Screech.
Click to expand...

You want a list or for me to just send it in spreadsheet format?
 
#4,570
#4,570
hog88 said:
I disagree. We shouldn't be investigating someone simply because they were elected.

Now, if it were possible to chip a politician after they assume office so all movement, conversations and activity are recorded, sure.
Click to expand...

Mhm, I like the way you think. Once they assume office they have waived all rights to privacy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,571
#4,571
Well here it is: An ex-Trump campaign member stating that he believes collusion with the Russians actually occurred. The onion us peeling closer to the massive stank in the center:

"Ultimately, Nunberg told CNN that Trump “may very well have done something during the election with the Russians."

He said specifically that he felt former Trump foreign policy adviser Carter Page "was colluding with the Russians" but suggested Page might have been a lone wolf. He also said he believes that Mueller thinks Roger Stone, his own political ally, colluded via contacts with WikiLeaks."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#4,573
#4,573
luthervol said:
What if it is proven that he instructed his subordinates to lie about the hotel meeting?
Click to expand...

What if you suddenly realized you're just as bad as the Pizza Slice (or whatever) conspiracy crowd by believing everything that comes along?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top