TrumpPutingate III: the beginning of the end

#4,152
#4,152
Mick said:
MOSCOW — A self-described sex expert whose videos highlighted the ties between one of Russia’s richest men and the Kremlin has been jailed in Thailand and is calling for U.S. help, claiming she has information about links between Russia and President Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ite-asks-u-s-for-help/?utm_term=.fc0582678006



article-oligarch2-0228.jpg
Click to expand...

So a Russian prostitute. Sex expert, lulz.
 
#4,156
#4,156
Mick said:
MOSCOW — A self-described sex expert whose videos highlighted the ties between one of Russia’s richest men and the Kremlin has been jailed in Thailand and is calling for U.S. help, claiming she has information about links between Russia and President Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ite-asks-u-s-for-help/?utm_term=.fc0582678006



article-oligarch2-0228.jpg
Click to expand...


Could be. But I'm a bit skeptical as a) she looks a bit more classy than Trump's usual type; and b) she does not have basketball-sized breasteses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,162
#4,162
Boston Vol said:
Well at least he likes attractive women, unlike a certain former president who had an infatuation with fat, ugly chicks.
Click to expand...

He's got that going for him. I think he gets a kick out of paying. He even tries to pay when it's not necessary. Says something about his character.
 
#4,166
#4,166
Mick said:
MOSCOW — A self-described sex expert whose videos highlighted the ties between one of Russia’s richest men and the Kremlin has been jailed in Thailand and is calling for U.S. help, claiming she has information about links between Russia and President Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ite-asks-u-s-for-help/?utm_term=.fc0582678006



article-oligarch2-0228.jpg
Click to expand...

Maybe this Russian author was one of Steele’s Moscow contacts who gave phony dossier insight? As usual, more WaPo click bait articles.
 
Last edited:
#4,167
#4,167
luthervol said:
Mainly to people who voted for him. Secondarily, to people who did not vote against him. Lastly, to people who are currently defending him.
Click to expand...

you can not vote AGAINST some one. You can only vote FOR someone. maybe if you guys understood the process you would win.
 
#4,168
#4,168
Just watched Peter King, on House Intel Cmte, discuss Hope Hicks closed door interview.
Said she killed it eloquently for 9 hours of hammering question. Gave second my second accounts in her recollection. Was very impressed with her, and she collaborated multiple testimonies to the T, which proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that their was no Russia collusion. And there still is no evidence that he or his committee has seen or heard from ALL sources, including intel sources.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#4,170
#4,170
Vol0725 said:
Just watched Peter King, on House Intel Cmte, discuss Hope Hicks closed door interview.
Said she killed it eloquently for 9 hours of hammering question. Gave second my second accounts in her recollection. Was very impressed with her, and she collaborated multiple testimonies to the T, which proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that their was no Russia collusion. And there still is no evidence that he or his committee has seen or heard from ALL sources, including intel sources.
Click to expand...

I figured his Viagra would wear off after 4 hours. He needs to see a doctor.

With a name like Peter King he has to live up to his name.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4,171
#4,171
Vol0725 said:
Just watched Peter King, on House Intel Cmte, discuss Hope Hicks closed door interview.
Said she killed it eloquently for 9 hours of hammering question. Gave second my second accounts in her recollection. Was very impressed with her, and she collaborated multiple testimonies to the T, which proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that their was no Russia collusion. And there still is no evidence that he or his committee has seen or heard from ALL sources, including intel sources.
Click to expand...

Yep I heard the same thing last night. Except the Shadow of a doubt part.
 
#4,172
#4,172
LouderVol said:
you can not vote AGAINST some one. You can only vote FOR someone. maybe if you guys understood the process you would win.
Click to expand...

How many Trump votes were less about voting for Trump and more about voting for the only viable alternative to Hillary?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top