Trump Preparing for Interview with Mueller?

#78
#78
Vol0725 said:
JOE DIGENOVA, FORMER U.S. ATTORNEY:

“But let's be very clear about this. The president has never been a target. The fact that he has been recently notified that he is the subject means absolutely nothing.

He is not even a subject. He is a witness. A subject is a person hesitate conduct is within the scope of the grand jury's investigation.

What the hell does that mean? It means they don't have anything on him. There have been 19 criminal cases. Not one piece of evidence against the president of the United States.

And now, we are told that Mueller wants to interview the president of the United States who knows nothing, who has been a witness to nothing, who is not a target of the investigation. What we are seeing now is conduct by two public officials, Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein that is unethical, unprofessional, an embarrassment to the United States government and is undermining equal enforcement of the law -- because of what they are doing to a president of the United States.

Rod Rosenstein single-handedly has taken away from the sitting president of the United States 16 months of his presidency by his incompetence and fearful conduct.

You know why Rod Rosenstein appointed Mueller? Because he didn't want to make the tough decisions you would have to make if you were supervising a case being run by a United States attorney like Huber. Rod Rosenstein is a coward. He is a disgrace to the Department of Justice. It's a shame --And you can't fire him.—-the president cannot fire him because of the political consequences. “
Click to expand...

C'mon Vol0725! LOL Joe Digenova is a hump. Even he and his wife walked away from representing Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#80
#80
PointGuard said:
Legal minds? A college professor's opinion matters less than the judge who is making the ruling
Click to expand...

You may as well give up on any expectation that the gun nuts will, or even can, be reasonable and rational.

The changes will not come with their blessings, cooperation, or willingness to compromise; but with them kicking and screaming about the 2A, government conspiracies, and the unstated goal of disarming all citizens leading to a massive uprising of the true red blooded American male.
 
#81
#81
luthervol said:
You may as well give up on any expectation that the gun nuts will, or even can, be reasonable and rational.

The changes will not come with their blessings, cooperation, or willingness to compromise; but with them kicking and screaming about the 2A, government conspiracies, and the unstated goal of disarming all citizens leading to a massive uprising of the true red blooded American male whom don’t wear vagina beanies or have hyphenated last names.
Click to expand...

fyp
:)
 
#82
#82
luthervol said:
You may as well give up on any expectation that the gun nuts will, or even can, be reasonable and rational.

The changes will not come with their blessings, cooperation, or willingness to compromise; but with them kicking and screaming about the 2A, government conspiracies, and the unstated goal of disarming all citizens leading to a massive uprising of the true red blooded American male.
Click to expand...

I would hope every person would only give up protected rights kicking and screaming.
 
#84
#84
McDad said:
I would hope every person would only give up protected rights kicking and screaming.
Click to expand...

Nobody is giving up a protected right.....that's sort of the point. You guys see it as such, and sane people see the ridiculousness of that stance.

YOU GET TO KEEP YOUR GUNS!!!!!!!
 
#85
#85
luthervol said:
You may as well give up on any expectation that the gun nuts will, or even can, be reasonable and rational.

The changes will not come with their blessings, cooperation, or willingness to compromise; but with them kicking and screaming about the 2A, government conspiracies, and the unstated goal of disarming all citizens leading to a massive uprising of the true red blooded American male.
Click to expand...

You need to stop using the word compromise. You really mean confiscation. And you know it.
 
#86
#86
luthervol said:
Nobody is giving up a protected right.....that's sort of the point. You guys see it as such, and sane people see the ridiculousness of that stance.

YOU GET TO KEEP YOUR GUNS!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Nope. You are indeed trying to take a constitutional protected right while claiming you’re not!
 
#87
#87
NorthDallas40 said:
You need to stop using the word compromise. You really mean confiscation. And you know it.
Click to expand...

The use of "compromise" was intentional. "Confiscation" is the ridiculous term.

NOBODY IS COMING TO TAKE YOUR GUNS!!!!!! Find something else to fill the need of obsessive paranoia.
 
#88
#88
luthervol said:
Nobody is giving up a protected right.....that's sort of the point. You guys see it as such, and sane people see the ridiculousness of that stance.

YOU GET TO KEEP YOUR GUNS!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Forgive me for having zero trust in what Socialists or government says.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#89
#89
#90
#90
NorthDallas40 said:
Nope. You are indeed trying to take a constitutional protected right while claiming you’re not!
Click to expand...

Not in the least. That may be my new litmus test. Anyone taking that position is a paranoid gun nut, everyone else has the potential of participating in a rational and reasonable way.
 
#92
#92
luthervol said:
Not in the least. That may be my new litmus test. Anyone taking that position is a paranoid gun nut, everyone else has the potential of participating in a rational and reasonable way.
Click to expand...

Actually I advocate telling the lot of you facist policy gun grabbers to f-off and go change the law if you want. Go talk amongst yourselves. Our reasonable and rational side wants nothing to do with you and want several laws on the books removed.
 
#95
#95
Behr said:
How do you know? I've never posted my name, McDad.

I think your avi and mine are equally awesome.
Click to expand...

You're such a better poster, nay, a better person than Grand Vol.
 
#96
#96
NorthDallas40 said:
You’re right. They aren’t. I live in TX and I damn sure know I have nothing to worry about here. Now in the Chicago suburbs not so much. They are indeed taking your guns in Deerfield!!

Deerfield, Illinois, just banned assault weapons. The penalty? Up to $1,000 a day. - CNN
Click to expand...

except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card."

Sounds reasonable. It's a suburb of 18,000. You can't walk into Neyland Stadium with an assault weapon. UT has no respect for 2A.
 
#97
#97
PointGuard said:
C'mon Vol0725! LOL Joe Digenova is a hump. Even he and his wife walked away from representing Trump.
Click to expand...

Ya lol.

I’m sure your ciriculum vitae , experience and insider know how provides us all the reputable opinion that one needs to respect and agree with you.
 
#99
#99
PointGuard said:
I try to base what I think (my decisions) based on facts.

National Review, Hannity, Tucker, Laura, Beck, and other extreme right whackjobs not so much. Oh let's add the Russian Bots to that list
Click to expand...

Facts? Hahahaahahah!!!

Ahh now I get you...you believe in the fantasy narrative. Trump engaged in a criminal conspiracy with the Kremlin to influence and win the presidency.

Got it .
 
#100
#100
luthervol said:
except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card."

Sounds reasonable. It's a suburb of 18,000. You can't walk into Neyland Stadium with an assault weapon. UT has no respect for 2A.
Click to expand...

Lol. Great example of your agenda. Thanks for that one you facist. Now here’s the whole quote.

it is unlawful for a person "to carry, keep, bear, transport or possess an assault weapon in the Village," except if the weapon is "broken down in a non-functioning state," is "not immediately accessible to any person," or is "unloaded and enclosed in a case, firearm carrying box, shipping box, or other container by a person who has been issued a currently valid Firearm Owner's Identification Card."
Click to expand...

Lol! A “valid Firearm Owners Identification Card”! Classic fascism!!
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top