LouderVol
Extra and Terrestrial
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 60,006
- Likes
- 61,401
Can you post links to your rants instead of copying and pasting other peoples work?
Let me clear, concise and without even an iota of confusion in my response to you @hog88.
Suck it, moron.
Ahh... that feels better.
Again, I do apologize for being capable of constructing comprehensive, detailed posts with big words that likely confuse you. That's on you, Sugart*ts. As for me, you should be happy that a UT education produced something.
And, BTW, nice job attacking the messenger instead of actually responding to the message. Par for the course.
In case I forgot to mention it...See, that wasn't hard now was it? We can all tell that this post wasn't AI generated or assisted, it's clear that this post is 100% authentic TurboMonty.
Welcome back brother.
the economy is not weak, 4% GDP expected Q3
the economy is not weak, 4% GDP expected Q3
consumer spending up
EDIT: the job market was in the toilet under Biden. Trump fired Biden's BLS person for falsely creating almost 2 million fake jobs to make Biden's numbers look good. Those 2 million jobs were revised downward and caused Bloomberg's chief economist to declare the economy was in a recession in April 2024......under Biden..
revised down 911000
revised down 818000Loadingā¦
www.bloomberg.com
Loadingā¦
www.bloomberg.com
the reader comment claim was made that tariffs create a weak economy, I showed the expected GDP for Q3 is 4%....that is not a weak economy.What does this have to do with you and the "geiger capitol" completely misrepresenting or just (willfully) not understanding the study you posted?
One thing I agree on is that the 7%+ time period under Biden will be felt for about 3-4 years at minimum. But this notion that 2% inflation will ever be met or held over substantial time again. Like I said, I think all these adults refuse to recognize reality and admit that 2% isn't not a realistic goal for their own measures.Truflation shows inflation at 2.5% way down from Biden's 9%+. I would say 2% inflation is a good number.
the reader comment claim was made that tariffs create a weak economy, I showed the expected GDP for Q3 is 4%....that is not a weak economy.
The study showed tariffs historically have not caused inflation, so what do the VN tariff experts have to say about that?
I believe that high inflation as under Biden can leave some scars on the economy that will never go away. Some prices on things will never go down...One thing I agree on is that the 7%+ time period under Biden will be felt for about 3-4 years at minimum. But this notion that 2% inflation will ever be met or held over substantial time again. Like I said, I think all these adults refuse to recognize reality and admit that 2% isn't not a realistic goal for their own measures.
Just like interest rates, the 0-2% time periods were the anomalies, not the 2% and higher time periods.
The soft landing narrative has always been a fallacy. But saying that means you are admitting defeat in a political cycle where you have to promise only positive outcomes.
I believe that high inflation as under Biden can leave some scars on the economy that will never go away. Some prices on things will never go down...
Unions wanted wage increases under Biden so wages could keep up with inflation. Inflation drops to 2.5 % but wages stay high and the associated wage costs for business does not go away.
==================
Google AI
High inflation, such as that experienced under the Biden administration, is generally considered to have permanent effects on the price level and significant long-term impacts on household purchasing power, which some economists describe as "scars" on the economy and public psyche. The cumulative effects of price increases are permanent, meaning prices are unlikely to return to pre-pandemic levels.
Key long-term effects and economic scars include:
- Permanent Reduction in Purchasing Power: Prices rose by over 20% during the Biden administration, while average earnings grew by less than that when adjusted for inflation. This means a typical paycheck permanently buys less than it did at the beginning of 2021, creating a lasting reduction in the standard of living for many families, particularly those at the lower end of the income spectrum.
- Erosion of Savings: Families reportedly spent the entirety of their pandemic-era savings by 2024 to cope with higher costs, diminishing their long-term financial security.
- Increased Debt Burden: Inflation-adjusted credit card debt increased significantly, and consumer credit debt exceeded $1 trillion, indicating a lasting shift in household balance sheets.
- Housing Affordability Crisis: Monthly mortgage payments on a median-priced home nearly doubled under the Biden administration due to a combination of high home prices and rising interest rates instituted by the Federal Reserve to combat inflation. This has created a significant and lasting barrier to homeownership for many.
- Distortion of Economic Decisions: High and volatile inflation can distort investment decisions and reduce the efficiency with which productive factors are used, potentially leading to lower long-run economic growth.
- Psychological Impact: High inflation has had a significant psychological toll on Americans, with a majority reporting that it made their financial lives worse. This has created a lasting negative perception of the economy among a broad segment of the population, regardless of other positive indicators like job growth.
While some economists argue that a full reversal of the price level is not a practical or desirable goal (as it could cause a severe recession), the cumulative effect of high prices remains and represents a permanent change from the pre-2021 economic baseline.
What?
![]()
Fed researchers say tariffs actually lower inflation ā because they're demand shocks that slam employment and economic activity | Fortune
"Instead, tariff shocks appear to act as aggregate demand shocksāmoving inflation and unemployment in the same directions."fortune.com
I'm not sure a full blown recession would help, again truflation is almost at the 2% level the Fed wants. A modest downturn could help lower some prices on some things. People should just get use to the idea that prices on some things will never go down.Oh I agree with all of that. But there is simply no soft landing scenario where everything gets back to somewhat normal.
We should revert back to within 10-12% pre covid spending levels. To do that, that would mean 4.5-5.3 Trillion in spending. That requires cutting $1.5-1.7t in spending. There is no world where we do that and a much needed recession doesn't occur. So as expected, these idiots printed and spent trillions out of thin air and now don't want to close it down even though the sales pitch was it being temporary because of the pandemic.
where did you get 3.1% 3Q GDP number?3rd quarter gdp was 3.1%, and tariff revenue as a portion of GDP tripled.
View attachment 789891
You can't fix deficit without a recession caused by trillion plus dollar spending cuts. Like even with the tariffs. That was sold to shrink deficit. Now its being talked about using up 10 months worth of tariffs revenue for checks lol.I'm not sure a full blown recession would help, again truflation is almost at the 2% level the Fed wants. A modest downturn could help lower some prices on some things. People should just get use to the idea that prices on some things will never go down.
