Doctor Tobias Funke
Member
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2008
- Messages
- 15
- Likes
- 0
sorry man, I can't help you any more.
I think its obvious now that Butler is a harder game....especially since UNC is beating arky by 26 points right now
UNC is beating the same team who beat UT in the SEC tourney. The Vols will have to play a lot better than they did against Butler to beat the Heels (if that game eventually happens).
The Heels are playing with far more intensity than they did in the ACC tournament. Ty Lawson is healthy--and the entire UNC team is playing extremely well. I don't think it's based on inconsistent play from Arkansas.
UNC is beating the same team who beat UT in the SEC tourney.
No, they are playing the crappy team that lost the game after beating UT. You know, the team that got hosed in Knoxville and could have easily lost by 30 if Bruce didn't pull our starters. Raleigh and Charlotte are UNC home games. They have the "home" announcers too.
UNC could not have played like that against, 'ville, KU, UCLA, Memphis. TN and TX would have scored much better. Pathetic Arky play definitely made UNC look much better than they are. Lawson still wasn't explosive. Until he is, they will struggle against other very athletic teams.If you can convince yourself that the Heels are fake after the first two rounds, I'm not sure what part of the game you were watching. They pulled their starters against Arky with 5 minutes left in the game as well. Every player on the UNC squad has scored during the tournament.
I think the Vols match up better against UNC than did Arky--and that UT has a better team than did Arky. UNC's next game is against WSU and UT plays Louisville. Both teams have to win before an on the floor comparison can be made. But if UNC plays the way they did this weekend, there isn't a team in college basketball this year who can beat them--and the margin of victory does not matter. It's only W or L. UT advances with an OT win the same way UNC advances after winning by 30. No difference.
As UNC playing at 'home,' (it's not the Smith Center) that's based on the fact they won both their regular season conference and tournament championships. Had UT won out after Memphis, the Heels would have been in a different region. But that's not what happened. In any case, the Tar Heels are undefeated on the road this season with their only two losses being on their home court. So, I suspect you're not arguing that the Heels don't travel well.
UT/UNC would be an exciting game--especially if UT runs against them. The Heels are a lot better now than they were the last part of the season (while Ty Lawson was out). UNC has a lot of talented players who are playing well and playing with intensity.
If you can convince yourself that the Heels are fake after the first two rounds, I'm not sure what part of the game you were watching.
UNC could not have played like that against, 'ville, KU, UCLA, Memphis. TN and TX would have scored much better. Pathetic Arky play definitely made UNC look much better than they are. Lawson still wasn't explosive. Until he is, they will struggle against other very athletic teams.
UNC could not have played like that against, 'ville, KU, UCLA, Memphis. TN and TX would have scored much better. Pathetic Arky play definitely made UNC look much better than they are. Lawson still wasn't explosive. Until he is, they will struggle against other very athletic teams.
UT will have to play better and UNC will have to play worse, but sure UT could win if both things happened.
Definitely. We had a vastly superior Ohio State team on the ropes last year though. And we beat Memphis at Memphis. I have a feeling this team is craving another game with the feel of the Memphis game. Louisville first though. I'm ready for us to make some history with an Elite 8.![]()
UNC, Lousville, Kansas, UCLA, UT, TX, and then Memphis would be how I'd order these teams.
UCLA and Kansas are shoe-ins for the final four at this stage. Texas beats Memphis. The other three fight it out for the East. The East winner wins it all.
Nobody is a shoe-in this year. UCLA should have lost already. Texas will have a tough time getting to Memphis. This has been a great tournament so far. Very exciting, unpredictable games.
UNC could not have played like that against, 'ville, KU, UCLA, Memphis. TN and TX would have scored much better. Pathetic Arky play definitely made UNC look much better than they are. Lawson still wasn't explosive. Until he is, they will struggle against other very athletic teams.
you might consider the competition and the style of those games. There are at a very minimum two point guards I would take over Lawson for this tourney.Once again we have a hater. Lawson is only averaging 20pts 6ass and not turnovers so far in the tournament. He's back. If you dont think so ask the experts. Rivals has him as the number one point guard in the power rankings during the tournament play.