Too much ice

#3,482
#3,482
NashVol11 said:
"Accumulated millions rapidly" also known as marrying Tim Mynett who is worth millions
Click to expand...

With a net worth that increased 3,500% in one year.

Then there’s the Rose Lake Capital firm, with questionable value assessments in one year. From $1000 to $25M.

Hard work should be rewarded, but these numbers are comparable to winning the lottery, which we all know the odds for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,483
#3,483
luthervol said:
And if the girl hadn't been at a bar alone at 1 in the morning wearing a cute little outfit, she never would have been raped.
Poor decisions do not justify horrible consequences, even though they often lead to them.
Click to expand...
You half way get it. The difference is the rape victim wasn’t harassing LE, healing several laws in the process. Different means can often lead to the same end. Even if the rapists means are illegal and the agents were not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,486
#3,486
Orange_Crush said:
iS toO.
Click to expand...

He still doesn't get it but look at his post history even on this topic of an aggressive protestor. He doesn't know how to take an L.

He's that kid on the playground that you bodyslam. You walk away but he comes back then you full nelson him into submission. You say look man go on. He comes back then you put him in a figure 4. It goes on and on while he promises to get you next time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,487
#3,487
BreatheUT said:
He still doesn't get it but look at his post history even on this topic of an aggressive protestor. He doesn't know how to take an L.

He's that kid on the playground that you bodyslam. You walk away but he comes back then you full nelson into submission. You say look man go on. He comes back then you put him in a figure 4. It goes on and on while he promises to get you next time.
Click to expand...
Making up weird fantasies about children on the playground rather than simply taking the L about a stupid capitalization scheme 😭 bring back shame
 
#3,489
#3,489
NashVol11 said:
No, it's not. He's having to say "I truly believe" as if he's defending himself, while throwing everything he can at the wall including the "environment," instead of saying "as the video clearly shows" because the public doesn't agree that that's what it shows
Click to expand...
Do you want him to say what he doesn't believe? And for the record, everything he said aligns with the attnys I've followed that break down why they "believe" it's a justified shooting--listing the criteria by which justification will be judged. i.e. The totality of the facts known at the time that the agent used lethal force.

You're being a partisan hack. You're obviously free to be a partisan hack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and CobbVol
#3,492
#3,492
EasternVol said:
They don't have to now, either. It's part of the show. They were wearing masks etc. before people started following them.
Click to expand...
They we're already being vilified, doxxed online, and oppositional organization was well under way.
EasternVol said:
Remember e.g. Rumeysa Ozturk?
MemphisVol77 said:
Unfortunately. This is one of many reasons Trump is an absolute F-king idiot. Pick your battles wisely. He should have picked an easier target that couldn't be conflated with our involvement in Gaza.

It may go all the way to the Supreme Court for all I know, but she should lose her case. IMHO the government should be able to revoke green cards and visas for any reason or no reason. Being entitled due process shouldn't entitle anyone to residency outside of detainment. Detainment isn't even necessary as for all practical purposes immigration court could be held online.

Yes, Trump is an immoral jack-a$s as Rumeysa didn't actually support Hamas if I recall correctly, but that's irrelevant. It should be at the governments discretion. It could be a Jewish kid from England getting his visa revoked for writing a paper supporting Israel for all I care, it would still be irrelevant (If he had a Cockney accent it wouldn't be immoral, though).
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
EasternVol said:
True but were they acting like the Stasi under Obama? I don't recall hearing that they were.
Click to expand...
More hyperbole just the other side of the coin, but I'll play along. Yes they acted like Stasi. They revved up E-Verify. https://www.e-verify.gov/about-e-verify/history-and-milestones#y2011
I was in the restaurant industry back then and we lost a lot of good father's because systemic racism and reasons didn't allow them to obtain a driver's license........

Throw in illegal wire tapping to spy on political opponents and it's clear they were Stasi
EasternVol said:
I don't think so. People going to immigration hearings are by definition cooperating. It's part of the show I think.
Click to expand...
For the most part true. However, if they pick up someone that's since managed to get a few felony arrests before receiving their immigration hearing, I don't mind them being placed in detainment.

I know many disagree, but I fundamentally view residency as a privilege granted at the governments discretion and not a right.
EasternVol said:
I'll compare any government enforcers who view or treat the general public as opponents to be controlled or beaten to brown shirts.
Click to expand...
Where we fundamentally differ is in extension of citizenship privileges to non citizens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GVF
#3,493
#3,493
ETV said:
You’re treating this as they’re running around, picking out some random individual, thumping them on the head and taking into custody for no reason.

Usually, they’re on site to perform a job and apprehend those they’ve been briefed on. Once these protesters cross the line and intervene with the ongoing process, things change.

Protesters initiate violence and ICE responds accordingly.
Click to expand...

As I've gotten older I understand more and more the act of indoctrination and political radicalism. Indoctrination controls the mind. It's hard to break from it. The rule of law does not matter to the true committed leftist and even the middle of the road democrat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,494
#3,494
Orange_Crush said:
Do you want him to say what he doesn't believe? And for the record, everything he said aligns with the attnys I've followed that break down why they "believe" it's a justified shooting--listing the criteria by which justification will be judged. i.e. The totality of the facts known at the time that the agent used lethal force.

You're being a partisan hack. You're obviously free to be a partisan hack.
Click to expand...
"Doxxing ICE officers" has nothing to do with this at all, so if the attorneys you follow said that, find new ones. What I said isn't hackery, no matter how many times you attempt to state your opinion as fact. He's throwing everything he can at the wall to get to the guy's life being in danger when it wasn't, and people don't have to say "I *truly* believe" about things that everyone believes
 
#3,496
#3,496
NashVol11 said:
"Doxxing ICE officers" has nothing to do with this at all, so if the attorneys you follow said that, find new ones. What I said isn't hackery, no matter how many times you attempt to state your opinion as fact. He's throwing everything he can at the wall to get to the guy's life being in danger when it wasn't, and people don't have to say "I *truly* believe" about things that everyone believes
Click to expand...
Doxing, attacks, etc: That's part of the totality of facts known to the agent--i.e. that certain groups have been weaponized against ICE agents. It's definitely something the courts will take into account when trying to ascertain his mindset in feeling that he was in imminent danger.

Ironic. At least he stated his opinion as opinion, unlike you. You like to state your opinions as fact, while accusing others of doing so in the same breath, and blasting someone else for stating their opinion as opinion. Nope. You're not being an irrational hack at all.

And it's obvious that not everyone believes the same thing on this or much else. That seems an incredibly odd standard to hold.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,499
#3,499
NashVol11 said:
Great, then you were the first one not to and still added nothing to the conversation
Click to expand...
(Just for transparency, I'll point out that I edited that post with several more points.)

If I added noting to the conversation, it merely means that your conversation is still worthless. Personally, I believe I added quite a bit to the conversation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#3,500
#3,500
Orange_Crush said:
(Just for transparency, I'll point out that U edited with several more points.)

If I added noting to the conversation, it merely means that your conversation is worthless. Personally, I believe I added quite a bit to the conversation.
Click to expand...
You are entitled to your belief. At least you can say that straightforwardly instead of the incredibly wimpy "well if you consider all the irrelevant facts I can think of to make the situation sound worse, I truly believe that I added something" version
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top