To Protect and to Serve...

Status
Not open for further replies.
This from another forum I sometimes visit, make of it what you will.

I agree with the principal involvement and clearing the room but just a guess being able to talk kids into things is probably easier/harder depending on where you are an SRO officer at. I think it's a shame that America allows lawsuits over stuff such as this.
 
She was talked to by a teacher.... Talked to by a guidance counselor/ administrator.... When they decide to physically remove her how do you expect it to look... My daughter had her phone confiscated at school and told she could have it back at the end of the day and if it came out again it would be gone for the year.... My daughter gave them the phone and never had it out again and surprisingly that was the end of it.....I don't know what should have been done but it's definitely not easy and you can't let kids get away with it bc they end up ruling the school

And if your daughter had refused and been slammed to the ground and thrown across the room, you'd be ok with it? And don't respond with the typical "my daughter wouldn't do that" reply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I agree with the principal involvement and clearing the room but just a guess being able to talk kids into things is probably easier/harder depending on where you are an SRO officer at. I think it's a shame that America allows lawsuits over stuff such as this.

I think it's a shame you don't seem to have any problem with what he did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I agree with the principal involvement and clearing the room but just a guess being able to talk kids into things is probably easier/harder depending on where you are an SRO officer at. I think it's a shame that America allows lawsuits over stuff such as this.

Where would it be harder? I'm pretty happy with the relationship I see between most of our School Police, SROs and the students.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Did you read it, or you just wanting to *****?

Yes I read it and the writer is full of sh** and the perpetual "cops never do anything wrong" bullsh** from right wingers who for some reason have no issues worshipping that branch of the government.

Not to mention absolutely nothing new was in that article.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Yes I read it and the writer is full of sh** and the perpetual "cops never do anything wrong" bullsh** from right winger who for some reason have no issues worshipping that branch of the government.

It was a complete break down of what happened.

Screenshots and what actions were taken during the altercation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Yes I read it and the writer is full of sh** and the perpetual "cops never do anything wrong" bullsh** from right wingers who for some reason have no issues worshipping that branch of the government.

Not to mention absolutely nothing new was in that article.

and he spends half the time saying the cop wasn't in the right, and could/should have done things better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
and he spends half the time saying the cop wasn't in the right, and could/should have done things better.

This officer, in my opinion, did nothing wrong. There’s nothing racist about this. The one to blame here is the student.

That's a quote from the article.

And saying he spent "half the time saying the cop wasn't in the right", even in the quoted article, you seriously need to check your percentages. He basically throws in a few lines of "he may be wrong".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people

I watched the video and the author is full of crap. She isn't punching or kicking. She is attempting to remain seated and struggling against him. She is wrong, but to say that she kicked her desk over is just dumb. He is the one that lifted her and slammed her over. There is just no need for that kind of force for a non violent non threatening situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement

Back
Top