To Protect and to Serve...

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

Yep. You aren't married.


Has nothing to do with being whipped.

My lady lives with me and we do not acknowledge the government document called a marriage license.

 

[Obsessed]

My lady lives with me and we do not acknowledge the government document called a marriage license.

So you both are scared of commitment?

 

[Grand Vol]

My lady lives with me and we do not acknowledge the government document called a marriage license.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

So you both are scared of commitment?

Well, we've been together almost 10 years, we only fear the government and other folks who wish to do us harm.

 

[volbeast33]

Like?

traffic laws and drunk driving for two

 

[volbeast33]

So you both are scared of commitment?

A plan to keep half his stuff?

 

[Obsessed]

A plan to keep half his stuff?

That doesn't matter after 7 years.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

traffic laws and drunk driving for two

Ok, beast. Can't you see how those fall into the initiation of force/violence against another.

 

[volbeast33]

Ok, beast. Can't you see how those fall into the initiation of force/violence against another.

What laws do not?

 

[volbeast33]

That doesn't matter after 7 years.

I picture him outside the courthouse.....your laws have no bearance on me lol

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

What laws do not?

Any law that obstructs peaceful people from doing as they wish, as long as they aren't hurting anyone else.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

.

 

[jp1]

Any law that obstructs peaceful people from doing as they wish, as long as they aren't hurting anyone else.

So actually hurting someone else, or planning to hurt someone else? Curious how you view the 2 people from Mississippi that was recently arrested trying to join ISIS.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

So actually hurting someone else, or planning to hurt someone else? Curious how you view the 2 people from Mississippi that was recently arrested trying to join ISIS.

You actually have to injure another party in order for a crime to be committed. You can plan all you like, until the deed is done, there is no crime.

If someone wants to go join ISIS who cares, at least they're not here.

 

[jp1]

You actually have to injure another party in order for a crime to be committed. You can plan all you like, until the deed is done, there is no crime.

If someone wants to go join ISIS who cares, at least they're not here.

Ok same argument. How bout your girlfriend of 10 years hires someone to kill you, but you find out before the deed is committed. Does she walk unpunished?

Same argument, someone makes a bomb to blow up a building. They plant the bomb, but luckily the detonation device fails.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

Ok same argument. How bout your girlfriend of 10 years hires someone to kill you, but you find out before the deed is committed. Does she walk unpunished?

I would say so, I found out beforehand. No harm was done to me, so no crime was committed.

 

[tim]

You actually have to injure another party in order for a crime to be committed. You can plan all you like, until the deed is done, there is no crime.

If someone wants to go join ISIS who cares, at least they're not here.

Breaking my own rule here..... ISIS is not a country.

 

[jp1]

I would say so, I found out beforehand. No harm was done to me, so no crime was committed.

What about my second scenario? My bad, I think I editted while you were typing.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

Ok same argument. How bout your girlfriend of 10 years hires someone to kill you, but you find out before the deed is committed. Does she walk unpunished?

Same argument, someone makes a bomb to blow up a building. They plant the bomb, but luckily the detonation device fails.

I didn't see your edit about the bomb.

In that scenario, I would say the property owner would be able to file some sort of endangerment or criminal trespass charges against the bombers.

 

[jp1]

I didn't see your edit about the bomb.

In that scenario, I would say the property owner would be able to file some sort of endangerment or criminal trespass charges against the bombers.

So the building owner was the victim? How did he/she get hurt?

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

So the building owner was the victim? How did he/she get hurt?

They were deliberately placing a bomb on the owners property. They'd be subject to at least criminal trespass charges.

Edit.
I would also say, if there is a phoned in threat the owner may be able to obtain restitution from the bombers for the lost revenue.

 

[jp1]

They were deliberately placing a bomb on the owners property. They'd be subject to at least criminal trespass charges.

So our building was the mall, they had a right to be there. I can't seem to put my finger on a victim here.

Enough with the back and forth though. I think you see what I'm getting at though.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

So our building was the mall, they had a right to be there. I can't seem to put my finger on a victim here.

Enough with the back and forth though. I think you see what I'm getting at though.

No, you do not have a right to be at the mall. That is property that is owned by someone, they can revoke your "right" at any time they wish.

 

[jp1]

No, you do not have a right to be at the mall. That is property that is owned by someone, they can revoke your "right" at any time they wish.

Okay...lol......the city park.