Cdywolfe
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2009
- Messages
- 5,583
- Likes
- 3,977
I just simply think you're a douche and and was glad the thread wouldn't be littered with ignorance anymore. Since I knew beyond all doubt you'd be lurking, I expressed those thoughts.
I don't really have any problems with GV, I just like to saber rattle and get his goat.
In this forum, to be honest, you have to at least be able to take what you dish out. If you're going to call someone lazy/unemployed/feminine because they don't agree with you, you better be able to take being called a jackbooted oppressor in turn.
I've been called all manner of laughably off-base crap on here. I haven't released my girly drama post saying I'm leaving but I'm not just kidding I'm back but now I'm gone again BECKY YOU'RE SO MEAN
And yet so many others that share the same feelings as you kept their mouths shut and let me be in peace.
However, you and a couple of others just couldn't contain yourself for some unknown reason. You realize the post directed at you was well after I posted what would have been my final post? And only until you and a couple of others started clicking your heels together three times and invoking my name did I come back to nut stomp you with some well placed words of my displeasure of your attitude? If you and others can't grasp the fact that if you don't run your mouth like a teenage girl on Facebook, I probably would have been content to lurk and at least garner Freak his click royalties. But obviously you just can't seem to take that hint. So clearly, my supposition of your idiocy in other posts must be spot on if you can't make the connection between my lack of posting and your nasty thoughts on my departure.
And as for my final post, there were others that did ask where I happened to be and I felt I owed them at least a final shout out. And most of them weren't douches about it either. One in particular showed his ass, but you my friend just went well above and beyond the call of duty in saying what you had no business saying.
Now if you feel like I'm not "wanted" or I've "worn out my welcome" you are more than free to report this post and talk directly with the owner about it. Freak is a good man and he will probably discuss the matter with you. And if he decides it's time for me to go, I'll leave without any feedback or hesitation. But as originally stated, it's not your place to determine when I've worn out my welcome. That's my decision and Freak's decision to make.
Hope you have a wonderful weekend.
Three words I never used in connection with you at any point.
I may have called you dumb perhaps. Over the top, sure. But never lazy, unemployed or feminine. Unless you count the analogy of chatting like a teenage girl as being called "feminine." Which isn't as much of a description of your manhood as it was of character.
Three words I never used in connection with you at any point.
I may have called you dumb perhaps. Over the top, sure. But never lazy, unemployed or feminine. Unless you count the analogy of chatting like a teenage girl as being called "feminine." Which isn't as much of a description of your manhood as it was of character.
Funny seeing all these negative things police officers are doing in the news. Because we all know the good things they do will never hit the news. Simply because it's not a shock factor. Or news worthy.
A cop that finds a way to not kill or beat someone should never be news worthy. I agree that it happens all the time and far outweighs the bad interactions between the public and police but are you seriously saying that a cop doing their job as they're supposed to do it is news worthy?
People don't have news stories fellating firefighters. Because in the event a firefighter goes into a house and beats up an unruly housefire victim because they were terrified... that should make the news. A fire where people are rescued shouldn't and almost never does.
The purpose of the media is to expose corruption. While I absolutely think that the media does try to angle and make it an issue of race (where it's an issue of social class) the media at large zeroes in on corrupt cops and the politicians that enable them. Cops that are corrupt and do not serve the public should be exposed. It's really that simple.
I'm talking about when they do things that are going above and beyond the call of duty. You knew exactly what I was talking about.
I don't mind the media exposing true corrupt a-holes like the cop in Charleston. However when you're looking for anything to create that race angle and all "coppers" are targeting Black's or are on power trips it creates a divide. And unnecessary one at that.
Don't be so delusional. You know there are great LEO's that are going to be painted in a negative light because of the actions of a few. The same reason gun control activists get all crazy when some narcissistic A-hole goes and shoots a place up. That one person does not define all gun owners. Just like the actions of a few cops don't define others.
It doesn't quite work that way Snyper. You say that folks who tell the truth about cops are delusional, then bring up gun control. Pray tell, who is it who'll be enforcing this gun control but the cops...
Point being, cops take an oath to enforce the laws; all of them. Many of these laws are cruel and unjust, doesn't matter if the law conflicts with their conscience or not. They're to enforce these laws as part of their job.
Therefore, every cop has agreed to act as an enforcer of laws that are manifestly unjust, or even cruel and wicked.
There are no "good" cops.
Do you have an argument as to how I'm wrong?
I never said people who blow the whistle on bad cops are delusional. I simply stated they are painting other cops in a bad light because of the reasons. "Cops are racist" "all cops are the same". A cop could be the best person or LEO in the damn country and people are going to see him in that same light. Simply because we don't see the ones going above and beyond their job duties as news worthy.
Secondly.. You are relating that there are no good cops because of your own personal opinions of the laws they enforce. This is why what you typed is crap. Just because you don't agree with the laws doesn't make the one enforcing them a bad cop.
Anyone can argue about the details of 900,000 individuals doing their jobs, some with the best of intentions. It's about a system, a system cops voluntarily participate in that both perpetrates and perpetuates injustice, and one that violently precludes competitors who would both respect and protect individual rights.
