I'm ready for Grand Vol's rebuke now. Or is he back on his self-imposed vacation or banishment? I can't keep up with his reality TV show levels of drama.
You know, you could have left well enough alone as well. Why do some of you persist in being total douchebags when I stopped posting? I said bye, nothing more, nothing less. Never mentioned any other poster, never said anything more than "rethinking my position" and never made a grab for attention. I posted the Buddy Jesus picture for Dink and Mercy as those are two posters that would appreciate it.
However, you made yourself look like an egotistical prick when you decided to think you alone were responsible for my departure. Far from it slick, but that made me laugh. But in a blow to your ego, you weren't even in consideration for
my choice to depart. Yeah, sorry about that little piece of information. But as I stated before, some of you just have to call attention to yourself (that's called drama actually) by making a scene over my departure. Can't leave well enough alone and have to put up a post, or two now actually, that shows your true colors as nothing more than an attention whore. And I'm sure I'm not the only one that sees that. So truly, who is making all the drama? Me? No, I left peacefully enough with a final goodbye and nothing else. However, I'm not the one that made juvenile posts unlike you and a couple of others and started talking **** as soon as someone was gone. Now see, that's called
DRAMA of which you are entirely guilty.
As for the rebuke, it's funny about taking one quote and using it as a basis for an entire tirade. Here's what the remainder of the laws says:
(2) (a) As used in subsection (1)(c) and (d) of this section, the term "when necessarily committed" means that a public officer or a person acting by or at the officer's command, aid or assistance is authorized to use such force as necessary in securing and detaining the felon offender, overcoming the offender's resistance, preventing the offender's escape, recapturing the offender if the offender escapes or in protecting himself or others from bodily harm; but such officer or person shall not be authorized to resort to deadly or dangerous means when to do so would be unreasonable under the circumstances. The public officer or person acting by or at the officer's command may act upon a reasonable apprehension of the surrounding circumstances; however, such officer or person shall not use excessive force or force that is greater than reasonably necessary in securing and detaining the offender, overcoming the offender's resistance, preventing the offender's escape, recapturing the offender if the offender escapes or in protecting himself or others from bodily harm.
HB 179 (As Introduced) - 2014 Regular Session
But of course your article omits that since it is contrary to the shoot first quote they wanted to use. And of course, the standard of objective reasonableness would have to be considered at the time of the application of deadly force by investigating agencies. So there's your rebuke.
Now to wrap it up, can you stop being an attention whore and making posts about me? It is rather sophomoric and only attempts to create drama where there doesn't need to be any. And it isn't really winning you any points other than trying to garner more likes from the selected few that would do it anyway. Of course, not getting any e-cred and likes would be devastating to your fragile ego so there is that minor point.
Cheers.