To Protect and to Serve...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, same formula they use for global warming.

slap-o.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Okay, you said above it's never been challenged in court as a 9th or even 10th Amendment issue. So as of right now, they are against the law. Whether or not it's Constitutional needs to be argued at the highest levels of courts and a decision should be made. But since it's never been argued at that point, how can you say it's Constitutional or not? My opinion is it could be argued as one of those two, although your libertarian side will probably argue against the 10th as well (since it is still governmental control) and you'll press with the 9th. Which you would have a potential case.

Another point, I am willing to bet the the same arguments used to repeal the 18th Amendment (Prohibition) would be equally valid here. That would be just a starting point. And keep in mind, current drug laws are not even covered under The Constitution like alcohol was. So the Federal case against drugs is much weaker than the case for alcohol.
 
Another point, I am willing to bet the the same arguments used to repeal the 18th Amendment (Prohibition) would be equally valid here. That would be just a starting point. And keep in mind, current drug laws are not even covered under The Constitution like alcohol was. So the Federal case against drugs is much weaker than the case for alcohol.

I agree to an extent the arguments for drugs could be the same arguments that existed for Prohibition. But again, one was in the Constitution, one is Federal Code.

Actually, getting Prohibition repealed was harder than eliminating drug laws would be.
 
So NYPD lost another brother today, Officer Brian Moore died after being shot in the face Saturday.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top