hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 119,866
- Likes
- 176,250
Not responsible for getting shot. That's 100% on the officer and you can't take that away from him. He is responsible for his own actions. He is responsible for running from the police, and whatever just consequences that entails, but that does not include getting shot. He is not responsible for that at all.
It's like saying I yelled at my neighbor and my neighbor shot me. Yeah my neighbor wouldn't have shot me if I didn't yell at him, but in no way am I responsible for the result.
Your analogy doesn't make sense. Did the guy deserve to die? No, however he knew that there would be consequences to his actions, correct? If the answer is yes then he bears a portion of the responsibility. If he had fled in a car with the police in pursuit, eventually crashed and died is it100% the officers fault?
Guy's dead just because he didn't want to pay child support:hmm:
"Mr. Scott had been arrested about 10 times, mostly for failing to pay child support or show up for court hearings, according to The Post and Courier newspaper of Charleston. He was arrested in 1987 on an assault and battery charge and convicted in 1991 of possession of a bludgeon, the newspaper reported. Mr. Scotts brother, Anthony, said he believed Mr. Scott had fled from the police on Saturday because he owed child support."
Your analogy doesn't make sense. Did the guy deserve to die? No, however he knew that there would be consequences to his actions, correct? If the answer is yes then he bears a portion of the responsibility. If he had fled in a car with the police in pursuit, eventually crashed and died is it100% the officers fault?
On the face of it, its not like the cop set out that day to kill someone. If there was a struggle and the guy fought with him over the taser, it just seems like he panicked at the loss of control, and simply did not demonstrate the restraint that his training and the law require of him at that moment. That's a hard part of that job - having the objective awareness to be able to remove yourself from the heat of the moment and keep a level head.
But he wouldn't have been driving recklessly had the officer not been chasing him, right?
No....he's not dead just because he didn't want to pay child support. He's dead because he escalated the situation by running from and confronting the officer. Had he not done this, he'd still be alive.
I'm not saying the officer is without blame, but in every example of cops shooting someone the victim has played a role in it.
Sure, but that is pointless to this discussion because it's the officer's job to pursue. Everyone knows he is going to pursue. The person who runs knows the cop will pursue. It's not the officer's job to shoot unarmed, non-violent "criminals".
So instead of highlighting the police state, you make people think every white cop is a racist too? If thats what you are saying....sounds like a brilliant plan.
In this case it was, I found out a long time ago it's best to comply with the police. I've got a lawsuit pending now against the local fuzz for a number of things, and I'll live to see another day.
Sure, but that is pointless to this discussion because it's the officer's job to pursue. Everyone knows he is going to pursue. The person who runs knows the cop will pursue. It's not the officer's job to shoot unarmed, non-violent "criminals".
Did you read my post? I was saying it's just another segue into observing law enforcement more closely. I also said there are bigger factors than race. Don't put words in my mouth.
It's the foul smell of dog **** that leads us to cleaning it up off the floor.
I didnt mean to put words in your mouth if that wasn't your intention. Thats just the way I read it. I think including race in those cases just clouds the picture and get our attention off what it should be on. I truly dont think race played a part of the Brown and Gardner cases. I cant speak for the other. Thats just my opinion.