To Protect and to Serve...

Status
Not open for further replies.
#12,026
#12,026
Rasputin_Vol said:
You amuse me to.
Click to expand...

So let me ask the questions...

What purpose was served by making that video? What "awareness" was brought to the public? Minus the douchebaggery of course.

So really, other than trying to provoke a response from those TSA workers, what was he trying to accomplish?
 
#12,027
#12,027
Grand Vol said:
No, they love being called Nazis. Makes them feel all warm and fuzzy inside.

Are you seriously asking this question? Why don't you take your Go-Pro and march into the local precinct and ask the officers there why they don't like being called Nazis.



And again, you like to dress up anyone wearing a badge as a JBT stormtrooper waiting to kick someone's teeth in because you don't agree with the laws. This "immorality" crap is a farce and I can't even believe you're comparing what happened in occupied Europe and the Nazis to modern day law enforcement. It's beyond ridiculous and goes straight to ****ing moronic.


Get a grip on reality man.
Click to expand...
But, but ,Im an anarchist. Here read this article by some obscure diddly douche bag that is the smartest most awesomest guy who has all the answers to fixing this terrible country run by nazis and jack boots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#12,029
#12,029
Rasputin_Vol said:
TSA agent molests passengers all day and scan/xray their luggage... GV has no problem.

Yet passenger simply holds a cellphone in TSA agents face, and he screams in vasion of privacy and would probably feel gratified to see passenger get a typical police beating.
Click to expand...

Would you want some stranger walking up to you while you're working? Not only in passing, but then following you around and really being a nuisance? There are a lot of people out there.... Not just cops or TSA.... That would threaten to beat the **** out of that guy if he wouldn't get out of their face.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#12,033
#12,033
Carl Pickens said:
I'm not outraged at all. I'm just saying the tool with the camera is just that..... A freaking tool begging someone to kick his ass.
Click to expand...

Yeah that guy is an idiot.....there is not a single person on this board that would not feel like kicking that guy's a$$ if he was following them around acting like that at their job.
 
#12,034
#12,034
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Always so violent? Or, is that the former cop coming out? Nothing he did was illegal.
Click to expand...

You are right there is no law against being a d-bag. And he is that. Belittling these people's jobs. Shameful. He is a coward. You don't have the right to fly on a plane. Don't like the TSA don't fly. That simple.
 
#12,035
#12,035
volfanhill said:
You are right there is no law against being a d-bag. And he is that. Belittling these people's jobs. Shameful. He is a coward. You don't have the right to fly on a plane. Don't like the TSA don't fly. That simple.
Click to expand...

Or, perhaps the airlines should provide their own security. The tsa should be belittled at every opportunity. It's nothing more than corporate welfare.
Using tax dollars for something the private business should provide themselves.
 
#12,037
#12,037
tumscalcium said:
What kind of "Security" should each airline provide?
Click to expand...

That would be up to them as a private business. Something that would cater to their customers needs and wants, while also making it a safe environment to travel. Not some bureaucracy filled with half wits and morons. If you've flown within the last 15 years you know exactly what I speak of.

Anything government can do, the free market can do 20x better as well as much more efficiently.
 
#12,038
#12,038
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
That would be up to them as a private business. Something that would cater to their customers needs and wants, while also making it a safe environment to travel. Not some bureaucracy filled with half wits and morons. If you've flown within the last 15 years you know exactly what I speak of.

Anything government can do, the free market can do 20x better as well as much more efficiently.
Click to expand...

I fly all the time and have never had an issue anywhere.

You'll find the same tactics as now.
 
#12,044
#12,044
https://reason.com/blog/2015/11/16/man-slams-doors-on-cops-who-had-no-warra

"An unknown number of sheriff's deputies showed up at the trailer where John Livingston and Clayton Carroll lived at 3:30 a.m., looking for someone as part of an unspecified "assault investigation." The cops were apparently told the person they were looking for no longer lived there. According to Carroll, they asked Livingston if they could enter the trailer. Not without a warrant, said Livingston, who then closed the door on the cops."

Then comes the best part.

"The cop kicked in the door, got on top of him, started slinging him around beat him…" Carroll said.

Carroll said sheriff's deputies then started spraying mace on Livingston and using the Taser, according to the roommate.

Witnesses said Livingston was not fighting back and was trying to get the Taser out of the deputy's hands."

WOW! The 4th amendment is truly dead.
 
Last edited:
#12,046
#12,046
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Or, perhaps the airlines should provide their own security. The tsa should be belittled at every opportunity. It's nothing more than corporate welfare.
Using tax dollars for something the private business should provide themselves.
Click to expand...

Terrible idea, you fly much?

Now I agree we do not need the TSA as every airport could (they used to) provide their own security.
 
#12,047
#12,047
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
That would be up to them as a private business. Something that would cater to their customers needs and wants, while also making it a safe environment to travel. Not some bureaucracy filled with half wits and morons. If you've flown within the last 15 years you know exactly what I speak of.

Anything government can do, the free market can do 20x better as well as much more efficiently.
Click to expand...

Not each airline, there isn't enough space available at airports for EVERY airline to have their own security lanes. Now every airline serving an airport could chip in and pay a private security service to run the screening like it used to be.
 
#12,048
#12,048
hog88 said:
Not each airline, there isn't enough space available at airports for EVERY airline to have their own security lanes. Now every airline serving an airport could chip in and pay a private security service to run the screening like it used to be.
Click to expand...

True. I agree with that completely.
 
#12,049
#12,049
Maybe the anarchists have a point. I would rather have no police and just deal with the criminals...

Police Civil Asset Forfeitures Exceed All Burglaries in 2014

Between 1989 and 2010, U.S. attorneys seized an estimated $12.6 billion in asset forfeiture cases. The growth rate during that time averaged +19.4% annually. In 2010 alone, the value of assets seized grew by +52.8% from 2009 and was six times greater than the total for 1989. Then by 2014, that number had ballooned to roughly $4.5 billion for the year, making this 35% of the entire number of assets collected from 1989 to 2010 in a single year. According to the FBI, the total amount of goods stolen by criminals in 2014 burglary offenses suffered an estimated $3.9 billion in property losses. This means that the police are now taking more assets than the criminals.
Click to expand...
 
#12,050
#12,050
Rasputin_Vol said:
Maybe the anarchists have a point. I would rather have no police and just deal with the criminals...

Police Civil Asset Forfeitures Exceed All Burglaries in 2014
Click to expand...

lol

Don't worry, the police apologist will show up shortly to justify this.

As an anarchist, I've never said I didn't want cops. What I do want is market based solutions that are voluntarily funded by the people requiring the service. Therefore the police (security) personnel are actually held accountable to the ones paying their salary. Not some bloated system of enforcement that is getting fat on the blood of the extorted.

Technically, I'm an abolitionist. The term anarchist makes most fill their pants. I oppose all forms of human slavery.
 
Last edited:
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement

Back
Top