To Protect and to Serve...

Status
Not open for further replies.
#10,253
#10,253
volbeast33 said:
He should have sent the thug beating the hell out of him flowers imo
Click to expand...

The entire "restrained from shooting him" argument is a joke. First off, the assumption that shooting anyone is a reasonable option should scare any reasonable human being. But to then make it worse to say that you saw him but you restrained yourself due to the media reports recently, yet he sucker punched you as you were there trying to make a decision to shoot him or not is laughable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10,255
#10,255
Cops on the prowl for these pesky bicycle riders terrorizing the public. I guess there are no murderers, thieves or loose cigarette smokers to harass and kill.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_588_phFnvQ[/youtube]
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#10,256
#10,256
Rasputin_Vol said:
The entire "restrained from shooting him" argument is a joke. First off, the assumption that shooting anyone is a reasonable option should scare any reasonable human being. But to then make it worse to say that you saw him but you restrained yourself due to the media reports recently, yet he sucker punched you as you were there trying to make a decision to shoot him or not is laughable.
Click to expand...

I agree.....the cop didn't do his job.....his first job is to keep the criminal in control....he should never allowed himself to be in that situation
 
#10,257
#10,257
Rasputin_Vol said:
Cops on the prowl for these pesky bicycle riders terrorizing the public. I guess there are no murderers, thieves or loose cigarette smokers to harass and kill.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_588_phFnvQ[/youtube]
Click to expand...

It is hard to tell much from the video but nothing is more annoying than bike riders in the middle of a road.
 
#10,258
#10,258
hog88 said:
He didn't hold his fire, he got sucker punched, his weapon taken and the hell beat out of him. Sounds like he didn't have the option of holding his fire. Unless the new standard is shoot on sight?
Click to expand...

Hog described it best in another thread. Here's what he was specifically responding to...

"He calls for backup and tells the man to stay in the car, but he didn't," Boackle told CNN in a phone interview. "The last thing the officer remembers is getting sucker-punched in a parking lot. The next thing, he's waking up in a hospital bed with staples in his head."
Click to expand...

There's many different definitions of a sucker punch but most involve it being sudden and surprising, often from behind. So by definition you can't be sucker punched by someone who you restrained yourself from shooting. Unless, like he said, the standards are to shoot on sight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#10,262
#10,262
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Wouldn't the anarchist just order his own shot, since he's already paying for the cops shot's anyway? Lol
Click to expand...

The anarchist would want the shot from another establishment since the free market provides better shots than just from a single bar.

The statist would be grateful he was provided the shot from a public servant.

The cop still orders the two a shot.
 
#10,263
#10,263
Grand Vol said:
The anarchist would want the shot from another establishment since the free market provides better shots than just from a single bar.

The statist would be grateful he was provided the shot from a public servant.

The cop still orders the two a shot.
Click to expand...
I can see that, most anarchists I know would leave the bar as soon as the cop entered the establishment.
 
#10,269
#10,269
Grand Vol said:
You're going to get it from the "I hate religion" crowd now.

But if memory serves, Jesus was more into fish and loaves rather than loose cigarettes. But I'd bet the BATFE might have issues with his water to wine trick.
Click to expand...

Indeed. Jesus would be quite popular at parties. Run out of wine? Hey J, do your thing bro.
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top