To Protect and to Serve II

So why didn’t it change when drugs were legalized there?

You can’t see past your nose.

1. Those states legalized pot only and thought it would be a cash cow so they enacted taxes and fees to the point it made illegal weed cheaper than legal weed.
2. bordering states weed is still illegal
3. There is still a **** ton of money being made by the cartels/gangs on other drugs that are still illegal in those states.
 
You can’t see past your nose.

1. Those states legalized pot only and thought it would be a cash cow so they enacted taxes and fees to the point it made illegal weed cheaper than legal weed.
2. bordering states weed is still illegal
3. There is still a **** ton of money being made by the cartels/gangs on other drugs that are still illegal in those states.
And what about heroin and meth both legal in possession in oregon?
 
Possession is legal in Amsterdam. Albeit personal use

And are we supposed to believe those gangs are just importing thorough the biggest port in Europe for use in the Netherlands? No, they are smuggling into Amsterdam to distribute to the rest of Europe where the product is still illegal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
And are we supposed to believe those gangs are just importing thorough the biggest port in Europe for use in the Netherlands? No, they are smuggling into Amsterdam to distribute to the rest of Europe where the product is still illegal.
So, now the whole world needs to legalize all drugs..?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
You can’t see past your nose.

1. Those states legalized pot only and thought it would be a cash cow so they enacted taxes and fees to the point it made illegal weed cheaper than legal weed.
2. bordering states weed is still illegal
3. There is still a **** ton of money being made by the cartels/gangs on other drugs that are still illegal in those states.
So it didn’t work to reduce crime. And you have worse crime especially in California where they barely even arrest for drug possession in the big cities. With dirty needles and ODs and crime everywhere
 


In case you don’t read it. A parole absconder with arrests for guns and yep, drugs..
But for his parole release he could not have caught his pregnant x2 paramour on fire. How’s that for pre crime prevention?

Yeah, you conveniently left out the actual "crimes" that he's done.

He is a parole absconder with a lengthy rap sheet according to WJBK, including previous charges for guns, assault, and drugs.

And him getting bail for setting someone on fire is ridiculous. But that isn't anywhere near what I am talking about. I'm talking about non-violent and victimless crimes. Yet you conveniently moved the goalposts, yet again.
 
Yeah, you conveniently left out the actual "crimes" that he's done.



And him getting bail for setting someone on fire is ridiculous. But that isn't anywhere near what I am talking about. I'm talking about non-violent and victimless crimes. Yet you conveniently moved the goalposts, yet again.
Non violent Crimes like suggesting doctors and hospital admins need to be killed?
 
So, now the whole world needs to legalize all drugs..?

That would be the best solution but no I don’t care about the whole world doing it. As you and Ricky like to say we’re different. We have 2 countries on our borders where the Amsterdam is like bringing dope into the port of LA, it’s going adjacent states. Just a short drive from the port to where it’s illegal and can be sold for a premium.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
Yeah, you conveniently left out the actual "crimes" that he's done.



And him getting bail for setting someone on fire is ridiculous. But that isn't anywhere near what I am talking about. I'm talking about non-violent and victimless crimes. Yet you conveniently moved the goalposts, yet again.
It wasn’t intentional, I mentioned guns. My point was that the crimes almost always go hand in hand. Surely you can see a correlation between drugs and violent crime
 
So why didn’t it change when drugs were legalized there?
Have you missed the two times we both said that the taxes were so high that the black market was still able to thrive?
Consumers, even when talking about drugs, are price sensitive. If the streets are offering a better deal than the legal weed sellers, then WTF do you think they are going to do?
 
That would be the best solution but no I don’t care about the whole world doing it. As you and Ricky like to say we’re different. We have 2 countries on our borders where the Amsterdam is like bringing dope into the port of LA, it’s going adjacent states. Just a short drive from the port to where it’s illegal and can be sold for a premium.
Where is cocaine made Hogg?
 
Have you missed the two times we both said that the taxes were so high that the black market was still able to thrive?
Consumers, even when talking about drugs, are price sensitive. If the streets are offering a better deal than the legal weed sellers, then WTF do you think they are going to do?
Gangs will always undercut any legal drugs and will add more fentanyl and other components to have “stronger” drugs. But yet you don’t seem to understand this. Or a lot of other things
 
So it didn’t work to reduce crime. And you have worse crime especially in California where they barely even arrest for drug possession in the big cities. With dirty needles and ODs and crime everywhere
No because you still created a condition where the black market could thrive.
 
I’d bet I have worked more international drug interdiction than you.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahah sure. I bet you also helped developed a specialized drug addiction program that is being sought after and copied at hospital systems all over the country as well. You barely have an understanding of drug activity at all outside of pot smoking in the 80s
 
Advertisement





Back
Top