To Protect and to Serve II

[Rasputin_Vol]

No, not at all. It’s the cost of running an illegal business. It is not ok to sell drugs and not pay taxes. If it wasn’t illegal to sell drugs it would still require taxes.

Innocent until proven guilty.
The right to a trial
Cruel and unusual punishment or excessive fines and fees

None of this registers with you.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

No drugs should be possessed or sold. Do we let them keep the drugs until trial? So they wouldn’t sell or “lose” the item before the trial? Cmon thats silly

So we should let the cops keep the drugs so they can sell them and help fund their police force and take some of the burden off tax payers?

The government was able to fund local departments with something other than tax revenues. I assumed you pay taxes

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

This is just so hilarious and so stupid. You’re painting with a real broad brush. How did you manage to type this with a straight face. I didn’t realize that you know every single law enforcement officer in the world. And that they all bad. Well, go figure. Who knew. I hate to break it to you but here’s a news flash for all the morons out that think this way. Their not all bad. That’s like saying all politicians are crooks. Most are , especially the career politicians, but some aren’t. I also didn’t realize hitler and Stalin were actors. What movies were they in. Oh, it’s nice of you to worry about my private parks. But no thanks, I’m not like that. You’re the one that needs a cup. It must really suck to be you, seeing how you’ve a bad experience with every cop in the worl.

Highlight in his post where he said "all".

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

As silly as it might seem, I think this is a really good idea. You’d think that law enforcement agencies across the country would flood the streets and highways with cameras.

Why don't you move to Cuba and let the rest of us live in freedom?

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Police work at its finest.

My one comment is this. people are going to have to realize that they are not necessarily helping someone by calling the police. These people probably thought they were doing a good deed, but once the police are involved, the cops are likely going to engage some nonsense.

An obstructing justice charge on the very people that called the police is an absolute disgrace.

 

[dovervolz]

Why don't you move to Cuba and let the rest of us live in freedom?

That wouldn’t do any good I’d still have to put with morons like yourself. But hey, you could move and take your holier than thou attitude with you.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

That wouldn’t do any good I’d still have to put with morons like yourself. But hey, you could move and take your holier than thou attitude with you.

Because comparing cages is best.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

‎The Quash: This "emergency" PROVES our system doesn't SCALE on Apple Podcasts

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

People love their servitude, simple as that. March forward..... mask,vaccine, end. It’s what you’ve earned.

 

[hog88]

Agree. Although civil asset forfeiture is in a the civil courts and the requirements are not necessarily the same. A civil judge hears the facts and makes a determination. If the seizing agency wrongfully seizes property said agency is responsible for the attorney fees and other penalties. The conviction in criminal courts may or may not make any difference.

That is still complete ********. The .gov (police) should not be able to seize assets prior to a criminal conviction. Way too many agencies have abused this allowance.

 

[Rickyvol77]

Not a peep from our local police squad to defend their brethren

Nope that’s stupid. The correct response would’ve been ok see you and write in report that witnesses refused to give information and left scene. He could’ve wrote down the cars tag if he felt it was necessary for follow up

 

[Rickyvol77]

Do you guys ever wonder why people hate you?

Imagine caring that criminals or other ignorant people hate someone because of their profession 80-85% of the people I’ve ever met on the street have respect and have good relations with law enforcement

 

[Rickyvol77]

Wow, you are so informative. We get it, you got a ticket. @Rasputin_Vol at least seems intelligent and can argue an actual point. I have no idea what you are spewing half the time. Also, (and why I'm even trying to make a point with someone like you) why would I even need to defend obvious bad behavior by someone I do not know just because we were in the same profession? Do doctors defend other doctors who perform malpractice? No. I don't defend bad cops. However, I will defend cops who are being persecuted by people who don't even have the slightest grasp of the law. Once again though, you obviously have a deep-seated hatred for police to classify hundreds of thousands of people in the same category. You are a clueless bigot.

Those type attitudes usually points to parental upbringing or bad experiences with police due to criminal encounters

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Nope that’s stupid. The correct response would’ve been ok see you and write in report that witnesses refused to give information and left scene. He could’ve wrote down the cars tag if he felt it was necessary for follow up

That would have been the common sense approach.

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

 

[DJimgo]

nm

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Investigation launched after California officer filmed punching police dog

Cops explain what was going on. No harm, no foul. ("A position of dominance..."/video taken out of context)

 

[volbeast33]

As silly as it might seem, I think this is a really good idea. You’d think that law enforcement agencies across the country would flood the streets and highways with cameras.

In the state of Tennessee..... the courts ruled that you don’t have to pay those tickets.

 

[tim]

That is still complete ********. The .gov (police) should not be able to seize assets prior to a criminal conviction. Way too many agencies have abused this allowance.

Civil is not criminal. There is precedent in what you dislike

 

[tim]

Innocent until proven guilty.
The right to a trial
Cruel and unusual punishment or excessive fines and fees

None of this registers with you.

Its civil not criminal. Different standards

 

[tim]

And how long will the wheels of justice turn before the innocent receives their property?

You guys are nothing but a bunch of highwaymen.

Again. It’s a civil process, not a criminal process

 

[hog88]

Civil is not criminal. There is precedent in what you dislike

The authorities go the civil route because they can’t build a case for conviction and that is 100% wrong. If the state can’t build a strong enough case for conviction they should not be allowed to steal your possessions.

 

[tim]

For those of you struggling to understand “civil” asset forfeiture, think of it as a tax evaders assets being frozen.

 

[tim]

The authorities go the civil route because they can’t build a case for conviction and that is 100% wrong. If the state can’t build a strong enough case for conviction they should not be allowed to steal your possessions.

No, they’re totally separate. The seized assets cannot be awarded through criminal courts in TN.

 

[hog88]

No, they’re totally separate. The seized assets cannot be awarded through criminal courts in TN.

But in many cases the assets are taken prior to conviction and many time there is never a criminal case brought to court.