tumscalcium
Ano ba!
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2008
- Messages
- 25,460
- Likes
- 21,295
The burden of proof is clearly on the one making the claim. So, since you claimed an “inconceivable burden” would be placed on the healthcare profession, by all means, show your proof.
Yeah, that’s what I thought. You’re just trolling, as usual. Not even trolling well, I might add.Ridiculous drugs are already a burden. You have no experience nor nowhow with anything. Anything at all. That is clear.
Are you saying there would be zero burden whatsoever? Everyone would laugh their ass off at your stupid ass. Hahaha
Yeah, that’s what I thought. You’re just trolling, as usual. Not even trolling well, I might add.
See, you keep having me say **** I’m not saying. So either explain yourself better, or **** off.I don’t feel like explaining why the sky is blue.
You’re stupidity is well humored and expected.
You believe all drugs being legal will help with the medical profession? Your stupidity is hilarious. I do mean hilarious.
Stopping? That means prevention.My position hasn’t changed, at all. It’s my position that it’s not anyone’s business what you do with your own life or property. As long as you’re not hurting someone or someone else’s property, have at it.
I think, if we’re gonna have cops, they’d be better suited stoping actual crimes that actually have a victim. Theft/murder/assault/ so on, so forth.
I need to prove a future medical claim? You’re cute. Adorable even. Do you know how many drug claims paramedics are called for? Emergency rooms?What about your “inconceivable burden” claim? Lol
That you’ve still not proven btw.
You could probably start with Portugal...I need to prove a future medical claim? You’re cute. Adorable even.
You have zero knowledge of the medical profession whatsoever. You’re an idiot. Now that’s irrefutable.
I didn't watch the video. I'm an animal lover, and it's Sunday, so I'll go based on the comments I've read.
I'll answer for the LEO side. Unwarranted. Unsat. Unacceptable. The officer should be held accountable under the law, same as any other person. And under the "higher standard" theory, his days as an LEO should be over.
And no, unless there's a clear threat towards the "guy", he would not have been justified in shooting the officer. Good Lord people, how casually we talk about deadly force, and taking the life of another human. The unprovoked killing of an animal is a crime, but absent a clear and valid threat towards another person, not one punishable by instant execution. My Sheperd is like my child, and if someone shot my dog for no reason in front of me, well...hopefully I'd have the presence of mind to realize that the legal standard for deadly force had not been met. I can't throw that stone just yet, though...I don't know.
As I said, didn't watch the video. But wrong is wrong. Standing behind a badge is not about "privilege", it's about "responsibility". Serve and Protect. Seems like this was an abject failure on all points. Justice should be served here.
.You could probably start with Portugal...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...anyone-dies-from-a-drug-overdose-in-portugal/
What if that had been you sitting at home and then the cop pulls up and shoots your dog for no reason and then takes the stance this cop did? I can see how a person would feel very threatened by his behaviorI’ll stop just short of calling for the cops murder. I will say all medical bills for the pup should be paid by the cop. No, not the taxpayer through proxy. I’d also like to see at a minimum animal cruelty felony charges against the guy.