To Protect and to Serve II

#1,826
#1,826
Rasputin_Vol said:
You're focusing on trivial details and not paying attention to (or choosing to ignore) the actual issue here. The chief being high or not is of little importance. But he did smell of alcohol.
Click to expand...

Oh Ras, if you were smarter I'd likely explain how you taking this single line out of a single post and completely out of context is silly. But since I know you aren't smart enough to understand context, the application thereof or even basic reading comprehension, I'll just let this one go.

Perhaps you should just knock off and head on to sleep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#1,827
#1,827
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Body Cam Catches Cops Make Up Charges to Arrest Innocent Man Who Helped Them – The Free Thought Project
Click to expand...
Duty bound... once the cuffs go on, you gotta go to jail. It's the law.

When getting briefed from Officer Hawkins about what happened, Sgt. Nocella said, “So he can go ahead and head to jail, right?”

As Hawkins responds by saying he doesn’t have a problem with letting Hein go, Nocella interrupts and said, “Once the handcuffs go on, he goes to jail.”

Nocella continues, “If you date an animal, this type of (expletive) happens. So if he decides to help an animal and not act like a law-abiding citizen, his sorry (expletive) goes to jail.”

“Hindering?” asks Officer Hawkins, regarding what charge they should place on Hein.

“Hindering, uh, not following or obeying, whatever,” Nocella answers. “You were here. If you can make a stretch, if he raises his voice above what mine is now, he goes for (disorderly conduct). But he goes in a patrol car going to jail in the next five (minutes).
Click to expand...
 
#1,828
#1,828
Grand Vol said:
So for three weeks, they only had the word of the former chief to go on. And the remainder only came out in the past couple of weeks while an investigation is ongoing.

Why don't you give it a little time for crying out loud.
Click to expand...
Not 3 weeks... 4 days, at the most.
 
#1,829
#1,829
Grand Vol said:
Oh Ras, if you were smarter I'd likely explain how you taking this single line out of a single post and completely out of context is silly. But since I know you aren't smart enough to understand context, the application thereof or even basic reading comprehension, I'll just let this one go.

Perhaps you should just knock off and head on to sleep.
Click to expand...

And in your efforts to sound pious, you look more like a copsucker because you would rather ignore the fact that the chief was (possibly) impaired, and would instead play games about whether it was reefer or alcohol... as though that makes a difference any other time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,840
#1,840
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
I wondered that myself.
Click to expand...

Thought I posted the other link where I found the answer:

Corey Jones: Nouman Raja arrested in man's shooting death | www.palmbeachpost.com

Raja, 38, was being booked into the Palm Beach County Jail late Wednesday and was expected to attend first appearance Thursday morning as prosecutors and his attorney, Richard Lubin, discussed whether they could agree on bail.

Prosecutors charged him with one count of first-degree attempted murder for the five of the six shots he fired, including three misses and two shots that hit the drummer’s arms — one in his left arm near his elbow and another that entered the back of his upper right arm.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure how they are getting "attempted" murder out of that...

LG? Can you offer a legal opinion on why they would separate the shots out like that?
 
#1,843
#1,843
The charges, I don't know. I do see he was also charged with manslaughter. I am trying to get an answer for you, and will get back to you when I have some information.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,845
#1,845
lawgator1 said:
The charges, I don't know. I do see he was also charged with manslaughter. I am trying to get an answer for you, and will get back to you when I have some information.
Click to expand...

It's appreciated, but no need to go out of your way. It's just the first time I've ever seen attempted murder pressed on someone when the victim was killed.
 
#1,846
#1,846
Grand Vol said:
It's appreciated, but no need to go out of your way. It's just the first time I've ever seen attempted murder pressed on someone when the victim was killed.
Click to expand...

Article could be wrong. But, I have a relative who's a prosecutor, and I have a call into him to see if he has any information on how one charges in that fashion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,848
#1,848
lawgator1 said:
Sorry, apparently need to see the charging document to really have an idea.
Click to expand...

Just weird. Shot him six times, five of which were "attempted murder" and the sixth was the manslaughter charge.

From what I'm reading though, that AT&T roadside call will cook his goose.
 
#1,849
#1,849
Grand Vol said:
Just weird. Shot him six times, five of which were "attempted murder" and the sixth was the manslaughter charge.

From what I'm reading though, that AT&T roadside call will cook his goose.
Click to expand...


I remain if the opinion that we all have to be super careful about snippets of info from video or audio. For example let's say the suspect is on audio saying "hold on," but it's 2 am and he's armed. Just because he says that doesn't mean it's all that's gong on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top