To Protect and to Serve II

#1,676
#1,676
Rasputin_Vol said:
Liar... It says it specifically in the article. As a matter of fact, you chose to leave out the reason for the traffic stop when you first posted the link.
Click to expand...

So it says specifically "I got pulled over for tinted windows"?

It says "I predicted it." Inferring that was the reason, but not specifically stating it was the reason. Not very nice to call one a liar without solid proof.

And I try to cut down the articles to size, mainly due to DMCA limits because I don't want to get Freak into trouble. And I hadn't noticed the reason was cut out until you mentioned it. So an omission rather than being purposefully done.

Why are you so angry? You should learn to calm down a bit, let life roll, look for the nice things, smell flowers, chuckle at kittens playing, that sort of thing.
 
#1,677
#1,677
Rasputin_Vol said:
No, he had tinted windows.

Black man + tinted windows = cop erection
Click to expand...

So was it or wasn't it a nice gesture for that nice patrolman to buy a car seat out of his own money so that man wouldn't get into any further trouble and his daughter would be safe in her pink seat with butterflies?
 
#1,678
#1,678
Grand Vol said:
So it says specifically "I got pulled over for tinted windows"?

It says "I predicted it." Inferring that was the reason, but not specifically stating it was the reason. Not very nice to call one a liar without solid proof.

And I try to cut down the articles to size, mainly due to DMCA limits because I don't want to get Freak into trouble. And I hadn't noticed the reason was cut out until you mentioned it. So an omission rather than being purposefully done.

Why are you so angry? You should learn to calm down a bit, let life roll, look for the nice things, smell flowers, chuckle at kittens playing, that sort of thing.
Click to expand...

Grand, the section of the article you chose not to post clearly says "The officer told me why he pulled me over, which I had predicted".
 
#1,679
#1,679
Rasputin_Vol said:
Grand, the section of the article you chose not to post clearly says "The officer told me why he pulled me over, which I had predicted".
Click to expand...

There was also other stuff in that article that wasn't relevant to the intent of my post that I didn't post either. The intent which happened to be this nice patrolman spent his own money to buy a car seat with his own money. And attempting to be brief, I made sure I tried to stay within the DMCA limits of what could be copied and pasted.

But you can't even say "you know? That was a nice gesture."

Your hatred really blinds you to the nice things in life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,680
#1,680
Rasputin_Vol said:
Who said anything about individual officers? I clearly said in my post "cops stand united", meaning a collective coming together on a consensus that is of benefit to the people.

Maybe you should read slower.
Click to expand...

To stand "united" they are gonna have to all agree. So while you didn't use individual (and I did) it fit the problem.

Why do you think they have not "united" under your banner? (Assuming it is the right one)
 
#1,683
#1,683
I would like to commend that cop who bought the car seat for the little girl. While I don't approve of his profession, we're all human. Dude let his love light shine, nice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,700
#1,700
DEFENDTHISHOUSE said:
Which is ironic considering you wanted everyone to stop and look at your post about an alleged good cop.
Click to expand...

Actually, I just posted it up without regard to what anyone would think. Sometimes there needs to be some good news stories in this joint.

Don't even try to claim I did anything but post the same thing you do.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top