To Protect and to Serve II

Okay, give the whole thing over. Rape victim's names, current murder suspects, where and what they are conducting investigations into, the whole shebang.

Works for me.

Hell, I'll even go so far as to having a web cam that streams straight to the Internet attached to each cop. With citizens having 24/7 access.
 
Okay, give the whole thing over. Rape victim's names, current murder suspects, where and what they are conducting investigations into, the whole shebang.

Works for me.

Why should rape victims get special privilege? Being falsely accused of raping someone still gets your name released, but a woman that falsely accuses a man can hide in anonymity.

How many innocent men are ruined by false claims of rape because while the alleged victim is able to be protected by the law? Whatever happened to "justice", "equal protection" and "innocent until proven guilty"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Why is govt involved with welfare in the first place? And howmany of the family or domestic issues are made worse by family court intervention, with the cops being the enforcement arm of the law? Let's not even get another discussion going about some of these ridiculous traffic stops.

Also, I really hope a "welfare check" isn't what I fear it may be...

Welfare check, i.e. a family member calls us to check on a member of their family whom they haven't heard from or are worried about. Sometimes it's nothing, sometimes they're legit.

And domestics...please. It's possible that LE can make domstic violence situations worse but I've never seen it. Just this week, I've taken out warrants and arrested three a-hole men who either hit their significant other in front of children or threatened to kill them, himself and the victim. We then follow up with extra patrol at that location to ensure the defendant doesn't come back or if he does, we can at least arrest him again--as apart of his conditions upon release from jail.

So excuse me when I say that you're talking out of your a$s about domestic abuse and violence being made worse by LE. We don't create the problem, it already existed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
If they offered to take the guy home and make sure he was OK, I have no problem with that. I just wish they would offer the courtesy equally to the civilians.

That's the point, they don't. Had that been an average citizen, it would have ended up costing them the better part of 15k to make amends to the state. That's not even counting losing your job and a whole slew of other issues that will arise.

Notice though, as soon as they found out he was a cop, the voice recorders were turned off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
It's that whole double standard bull****. This sort over thing ruins people's lives.

True, but they aren't quite as heartless and as cold hearted as you believe.

Yes, they do cut some people breaks when it comes to just sitting in a vehicle and being intoxicated. Far more than you'd give them credit for.
 

I've done it. I'd guarantee the few other cops that actually post have said they've done it.

Weren't you just saying the other day that the individuals aren't that bad but the profession is what you dislike? Your buddy went into the force somewhat recently, do you feel he would bust someone "just because" as well?

I won't try to convince you if you're that dead set in your ways you can't be objective about it.
 
I've done it. I'd guarantee the few other cops that actually post have said they've done it.

Weren't you just saying the other day that the individuals aren't that bad but the profession is what you dislike? Your buddy went into the force somewhat recently, do you feel he would bust someone "just because" as well?

I won't try to convince you if you're that dead set in your ways you can't be objective about it.

Objective lol I've told you about supposed objectivity. Principle far outweighs objectivity.

So how does it work exactly? One person has their life ruined and another doesnt? Just happenstance? Because you met up with the wrong cop? Is that what happened to the ones who were wrongly killed by cops, like Kelly Thomas, and Eric Garner?

I cannot support the system because it's immoral at its very beginning. You cannot derive a moral end from immoral means. Yes, that means is taxation. It renders the entire system invalid, as it starts with theft.

I often ask, in my talks with folks throughout my travels, if people support taxation, most say no. Then I ask if they support the police, most say, of course. Then I ask, you realize it's taxation that pays for police, don't you? How can you not support the original theft, but support the fruit of that theft? It makes absolutely no sense from a logical standpoint. I guess that's why government is known as the most dangerous superstition.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement





Back
Top