volmoon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2006
- Messages
- 3,012
- Likes
- 2,543
Give a star to the petty.
Back to the main point. Firing Fulmer has proven to be the worst mistake in a generation fo Tennessee football. Period.
Dude.
Fulmer's last six years: 49-27. That's a .645 win rate. Two SEC East titles. Three different 10-win seasons, and another with 9 wins. Here, I'll bold the parts you seem to be missing:
Just to remind you: our very best seasons over the past 12 years since Fulmer left, our VERY best, were a couple of 9-win seasons under Butch. But nine or ten wins was the _norm_ with Fulmer. Even in those last six seasons.
- 2003 -- 10-3 (6-2 in SEC)
- 2004 -- 10-3 (7-1 in SEC) -- SEC-East champ -- Cotton Bowl victor (over #22 A&M)
- 2005 -- 5-6 (3-5 in SEC)
- 2006 -- 9-4 (5-3 in SEC)
- 2007 -- 10-4 (6-2 in SEC) -- SEC-East champ -- Outback Bowl victor (over #18 Wisconsin)
- 2008 -- 5-7 (3-5 in SEC)
Yes, Phillip got complacent. But even a complacent Fulmer is better than anything we've done since.
Anyone who thinks Fulmer has been our problem, or was even our first problem, is a fool. Getting rid of him was our first problem.
As for the rest of your post, I couldn't get past that first bone-headed statement. So I didn't read any more.
Go Vols!
1) Fulmer. Great coach, great guy but he was retained too long. The SEC and good teams clearly passed him by. (To the deniers- his record his last 6 years) Kiffin inherited an empty cupboard.
2) Kiffin. The right idea but a bad decision who napalmed the program. Terrible decision not putting in a contractual safe guard to leave after only one year.
3) Brown. Hindsight has proven keeping him for a year as interim coach would have been advantageous and probably program saving.
4) Dooley. Maybe to worst hire ever. A loser from LA Tech. Did nothing for 3 years- recruiting was a joke. He solidified our culture of losing.
5) Jones. Another awful hire who wasn't nearly big enough for the job. Could not analyze or develop talent.
6) Pruitt. Year 3- are we improving? Good coordinator. Knows the coference and game, but is he smart enough to be a CEO?
What's a commonality they all have besides losing to our rivals? It's our fundamental problem- ineffective leadership above them at the highest levels. How many visionless and unprepared ADs have we had? More importantly, how many clueless presidents and chancellors have we had? And above them is the BODs. There's our problem. Until they want stop making politically correct decisions (ie Davenport) and understand football's economic AND academic impact (ie Alabama) our football program will be on loop.
Seriously? By your own rationale, your last post is an oxymoron. Gary Patterson? The guy who the game has passed by?He needed to go. It was pathetic at the end. The replacement is what has been the problem. Pick Gary Patterson over Kiffin and we have got some hardware to show for the last decade. Or, if we still pick Kiffin, our Kippy in charge for a year when he leaves and then hire a real coach, then we aren’t cratering the program with Dooley, who had a losing record at Louisiana Tech. Or don’t hire Dave Hart, fresh off a cheating scandal at FSU and expect things to go well. Don’t let him wait until the last minute to fire Dooley, run and embarrassment of a search, and then panic hire Butch. Or don’t let Butch coach past 2015 and get a real coach in here set up with a ton of talent to get the ball rolling on his tenure. Or don’t hire Currie despite everyone at UT hating him during his previous stay and everyone at Kansas State, including their hall of fame coach saying they hate him. Or don’t let him hire an ******* that was only good at Rutgers for a short time before falling off badly and has been mired by scandals ever since. Or don’t let Currie run around the country interviewing coaches without our blessing and further embarrassing the program.
A preposterous series of idiotic decisions got us to this point. The inevitable firing of Fulmer had little to do with it.
One also has to remember though that Bama and Georgia were nowhere close to the level they are now, Phil had about 10 years facing them when they were down. Timing is everything.THANK YOU!
One of the dumbest, unfounded arguments for explaining the current Vol football dilemma begins with “Fulmer was“ “lazy,” “no longer relevant,” “left behind,” etc. For those who continue to make that argument, the athletic department at the other UT is also calling...Mack Brown, Rick Barnes.
Those were down while we were up. It has flipped Drastically.One also has to remember though that Bama and Georgia were nowhere close to the level they are now, Phil had about 10 years facing them when they were down. Timing is everything.
Yep. Put the blame where it should be, right at those fools feet. It all went to hell after Dickey left.He needed to go. It was pathetic at the end. The replacement is what has been the problem. Pick Gary Patterson over Kiffin and we have got some hardware to show for the last decade. Or, if we still pick Kiffin, our Kippy in charge for a year when he leaves and then hire a real coach, then we aren’t cratering the program with Dooley, who had a losing record at Louisiana Tech. Or don’t hire Dave Hart, fresh off a cheating scandal at FSU and expect things to go well. Don’t let him wait until the last minute to fire Dooley, run and embarrassment of a search, and then panic hire Butch. Or don’t let Butch coach past 2015 and get a real coach in here set up with a ton of talent to get the ball rolling on his tenure. Or don’t hire Currie despite everyone at UT hating him during his previous stay and everyone at Kansas State, including their hall of fame coach saying they hate him. Or don’t let him hire an ******* that was only good at Rutgers for a short time before falling off badly and has been mired by scandals ever since. Or don’t let Currie run around the country interviewing coaches without our blessing and further embarrassing the program.
A preposterous series of idiotic decisions got us to this point. The inevitable firing of Fulmer had little to do with it.
It’s really not about his record to date, or accomplishments or lack of accomplishments to date. It’s about his approach. We don’t like it. We don’t want to watch or listen to it. Especially the approach to feed us #2 every game. We are demoralized by that recurring choice. We don’t want to watch that anymore. We’ve watched it for four years and we feel like we are just watching reruns every week. Give us anything else and we will get back onboard. Heck a walk on pulled from the Sigma Chi fraternity a few hours before the game would get us all excited and back into the program. But the current TV show that he’s providing us. Well it needs to be cancelled, or rewritten with a new lead character.We don't know what this season will end up looking like. Aside from the painful loss to Kentucky, it has so far gone the way many of us predicted (wins over USCe and Mizzou, losses to UGa and Bama). There's still a lot of football to be played.
What we do know so far is this. No coach in Tennessee's recent past, aside from Phillip Fulmer, has had a better start than Pruitt in his first two seasons. Not Butch, not Dooley, not Kiffin, not even Johnny Majors. It took Johnny to his fifth season to achieve a winning percentage (66.7%) higher than Pruitt got for us in his second season (61.5%). Phillip started faster, but of course he had a running start thanks to CJM.
In winning percentages, here's how it looks so far:
View attachment 317865
So let's give Coach Pruitt some time. Stop mouth-breathing over one unexpected loss (though we are all greatly disappointed by it), and give the man time to show us what he can do.
If we'd been half this impatient with Johnny Majors, he'd have been kicked to the curb long before he got to his good years, his championship years.
Let's be a little more patient. Good things can come when you show a little patience. Our own history teaches us that.
p.s. A .500 win rate this season will be the rough equivalent of a .615 win rate in a normal year, because we'd normally have three FCS cupcake games padding the stats.
You are a mental gymnast. None of those fun stats address the issues we are seeing this year. Remember, if you only go by stats, JG is a pretty good QB.We don't know what this season will end up looking like. Aside from the painful loss to Kentucky, it has so far gone the way many of us predicted (wins over USCe and Mizzou, losses to UGa and Bama). There's still a lot of football to be played.
What we do know so far is this. No coach in Tennessee's recent past, aside from Phillip Fulmer, has had a better start than Pruitt in his first two seasons. Not Butch, not Dooley, not Kiffin, not even Johnny Majors. It took Johnny to his fifth season to achieve a winning percentage (66.7%) higher than Pruitt got for us in his second season (61.5%). Phillip started faster, but of course he had a running start thanks to CJM.
In winning percentages, here's how it looks so far:
View attachment 317865
So let's give Coach Pruitt some time. Stop mouth-breathing over one unexpected loss (though we are all greatly disappointed by it), and give the man time to show us what he can do.
If we'd been half this impatient with Johnny Majors, he'd have been kicked to the curb long before he got to his good years, his championship years.
Let's be a little more patient. Good things can come when you show a little patience. Our own history teaches us that.
p.s. A .500 win rate this season will be the rough equivalent of a .615 win rate in a normal year, because we'd normally have three FCS cupcake games padding the stats.
Yeah, I'd kill to have maintained Fulmer's last 6 years these last 11.Dude.
Fulmer's last six years: 49-27. That's a .645 win rate. Two SEC East titles. Three different 10-win seasons, and another with 9 wins. Here, I'll bold the parts you seem to be missing:
Just to remind you: our very best seasons over the past 12 years since Fulmer left, our VERY best, were a couple of 9-win seasons under Butch. But nine or ten wins was the _norm_ with Fulmer. Even in those last six seasons.
- 2003 -- 10-3 (6-2 in SEC)
- 2004 -- 10-3 (7-1 in SEC) -- SEC-East champ -- Cotton Bowl victor (over #22 A&M)
- 2005 -- 5-6 (3-5 in SEC)
- 2006 -- 9-4 (5-3 in SEC)
- 2007 -- 10-4 (6-2 in SEC) -- SEC-East champ -- Outback Bowl victor (over #18 Wisconsin)
- 2008 -- 5-7 (3-5 in SEC)
Yes, Phillip got complacent. But even a complacent Fulmer is better than anything we've done since.
Anyone who thinks Fulmer has been our problem, or was even our first problem, is a fool. Getting rid of him was our first problem.
As for the rest of your post, I couldn't get past that first bone-headed statement. So I didn't read any more.
Go Vols!
Smart guy who doesn't read, What was Fulmer's record against Tuberville, Saban, Spurrier, Richt, Meyer? I like Fulmer. He was good coach. But as you pointed out, in 05 things were quickly moving in the wrong direction.