There are some coaches that can "coach" like Pinkel and Biellema and some who can recruit and coach like Saban and then there's Butch ... can recruit and rah rah the followers but can't coach his way out of a paper bag. I just wish someone could explain how he is 2-0 vs the old ball coach.
I knew about their below average (by sec standards) recruiting. It blows my mind how coach Pinkle can get so much out of that.
The amazing thing is how many people wanted Pinkel fired after 2012. Many Mizzou fans and sportswriters were saying Pinkel couldn't compete in the SEC. So much for that. Pinkel has long been one of the most underrated coaches in college football.
Of course, the bad news for the NegaVols is that by their own standards, they would've wanted Pinkel fired after his first two seasons, as well (if they had been Mizzou fans). He went 4-7 and 5-7 during his first two years, and also went 5-6 during his 4th season. Pinkel didn't have a huge breakthrough till his 7th season at Mizzou.
I wouldn't mind that at all.. Will be pulling for Mizzou in the champ game if they win Sat
Do you have anything of value to add that explains why a program like Mizzou can take those type of classes and win with them on a regular basis?
Or better yet offer an opinion as to why its not relevant to our situation.