overseasorange2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2006
- Messages
- 7,470
- Likes
- 4,960
People close to the program say it’s a 2-4 week recovery. Tua came back in 3. If everything goes bad it’s 6. Don’t know where you got 8 from. What website?
People close to the program say it’s a 2-4 week recovery. Tua came back in 3. If everything goes bad it’s 6. Don’t know where you got 8 from. What website?
Tua also came back before the normal recovery window. Tillman should be back after 5 weeks of recovery putting him close to 100% percent.Tua wasnt running routes every play, I dont think he will be back either but good news is we are loaded at receiver and him at 75% is probably no better than what we have already at 100%.
Those 6-8 numbers wouldn’t surprise me. Medical practitioners are going to be very conservative in most cases, and for good reasons. Athletes in programs like ours will be in much better shape than your average patient, will have tons of resources to help optimize their recovery, and people seeing that they do exactly what they need to in order to heal. So it’s not super surprising to see a faster recovery timetable.
Or sifflus...lol
People close to the program say it’s a 2-4 week recovery. Tua came back in 3. If everything goes bad it’s 6. Don’t know where you got 8 from. What website?
Yeah the difference is the fine line of coach and athlete want to play. On the flip side the coach has to not risk the athletes future for sake of increasing odds of winning games along the way. Coaches and Universities are under more scrutiny than ever for putting damaged goods players in harms way earlier than they should.H*ll, I tore ligaments in my ankle once early in the rugby season and never missed a match. As a matter of fact, I didn't even leave the match in which it happened.