Thoughts on Season

#26
#26
When Barnes got here, we were poison. He dug up a bunch of underrated three stars, Canadian kids and other misfits to build a program into a national contender. Now he’s recruiting and signing top fifty players and competing for championships. Barnes is stubborn about a few things that I might disagree with, but I also understand every successful coach is. His winning percentage isn’t Dean Smith’s or Bill Self’s, but he also isn’t coaching at a program that recruits itself. He’s a great coach. Our kids play hard and well , and are almost all great young men. We’re lucky to have him, and dumb not to understand that. It’s been the best five years to be a Vol fan since Ernie and Bernie.

It's not our best 5 years since Ernie and Bernie. But, it has been interesting, for sure. Often fun, sometimes infuriating. The most frustrating part under Barnes is the feeling at the end of each season it probably should have been a little bit more than it was. I'll take it over Houston, Buzz, and Cuonzo eras, for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: orchidvol
#27
#27
When Barnes got here, we were poison. He dug up a bunch of underrated three stars, Canadian kids and other misfits to build a program into a national contender. Now he’s recruiting and signing top fifty players and competing for championships. Barnes is stubborn about a few things that I might disagree with, but I also understand every successful coach is. His winning percentage isn’t Dean Smith’s or Bill Self’s, but he also isn’t coaching at a program that recruits itself. He’s a great coach. Our kids play hard and well , and are almost all great young men. We’re lucky to have him, and dumb not to understand that. It’s been the best five years to be a Vol fan since Ernie and Bernie.

I second this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stoerner Fumbles
#28
#28
It's not our best 5 years since Ernie and Bernie. But, it has been interesting, for sure. Often fun, sometimes infuriating. The most frustrating part under Barnes is the feeling at the end of each season it probably should have been a little bit more than it was. I'll take it over Houston, Buzz, and Cuonzo eras, for sure.

Not asking you to take down any posters off your wall, but I’ll take Barnes over the furry clown who sweats through his polyester too. We have a better coach now.
 
#29
#29
Not asking you to take down any posters off your wall, but I’ll take Barnes over the furry clown who sweats through his polyester too. We have a better coach now.

We have a more likeable coach who won't get us into trouble with the NCAA. But, Pearl was more successful here and he's been more successful at Auburn than Barnes. He's a better coach. But, he'll never be back here and that's for the best.
 
#30
#30
I'm happy with the fact this team got a lot better and was hot entering the tournament. Michigan just happened to be hotter and paid the refs too. They weren't exposed, or choked a big lead like they've done in the 2nd half. It was a hard fought game. Now, had they not won the SEC tourney for the 1st time in 43 years it would definitely feel like a waste... but at least we're not getting garbage results on the court anymore. Heck, I didn't think they would be as good as they are this year. Even when Barnes doesn't have a very good team, it's not like they're terrible. I'm just done getting excited about them overachieving come crunch time. It's fine.
 
#31
#31
Your shooting percentage is what your average says it is.
When we shot 60 + in the first game, it is only natural that
it would average out later.
 
#32
#32
1. UT's 2021-22 had some great moments - beating Arizona, UK (twice), Auburn, and winning the SEC tournament - but this was ultimately another disappointing season with yet another early exit from the NCAA tournament under Rick Barnes. I think Coach Barnes is a very good coach (and I am not sure that UT could do better even considering his tournament failures) but the single elimination NCAA tournament baffles him and his teams for some reason. After the second place regular season conference finish and the conference championship, my personal metrics were sub-Sweet Sixteen finish would be disappointing (especially for a team that felt snubbed by its 3 seed), Sweet Sixteen but no better finish would be satisfactory but feel somewhat lacking as I thought UT was a T8 or better team, and Elite Eight or better would make this a great season. Well, UT fell well short of a successful end to this season IMO.

2. The NCAA tournament is a maddening affair. Basketball, unlike football and some other sports, is more prone to upsets and that's why the NCAA tournament is so great but so frustrating simultaneously. But there is an often repeated adage that a team's flaw/s will ultimately reveal itself/themselves in the tournament and a loss is likely to follow. There are hundreds and hundreds of examples of this but Memphis missing free throw after free throw in the final minutes against KU in the 2007-08 championship game is a prime example of it. Well, UT's scoring droughts, inconsistent three point shooting, and lack of a consistent inside presence ultimately doomed UT's 2021-22 squad as all of those things came to bear yesterday. I mean, how in the world does the #5 team in the country in the last AP poll and one of KenPom's T8 most efficient teams blow a 6 point lead with 8 1/2 minutes to go and lose by 8?

3. Under Coach Barnes, UT has lacked a wing that can get his own shot at any time and a true rim protector and I think UT's struggles in the tournament can be attributable to these absences. UT's best rim protecting duo was probably Grant Williams and Kyle Alexander but Alexander got hurt and that was a devastating loss for the team. UT did not protect the rim well again yesterday. UT has never really had the type of wing that I am talking about under Coach Barnes and maybe, maybe Admiral Schofield was the closest to that player, but he wasn't really all that explosive. I am hopeful that maybe Aidoo is the rim protector we have been missing but that remains to be seen. I currently do not see a wing on the roster or that will be on the roster that can get his own shot and that will continue to be an issue for UT.

4. UT has also lacked a hardnosed player that would take the ball through someone's face to get the officials to find their whistles again since Grant Williams left. When I say this, I don't mean faux tough guys like Uros who is just hammering on people and crying and whining the whole time. I mean a guy who will calmly assert physical control of the game. The reality is that Michigan was the aggressor and more physical team yesterday and it rattled UT and some of its players - maybe one of the reasons UT went 2-18 from 3. I saw Vescovi on the ground multiple times in the first five or so minutes with no foul calls and I thought it was going to be a long day. I think the officiating was poor and Michigan was able to manhandle UT without fouls called that were obvious fouls and then there were some inexplicable calls in favor of Michigan, but losers whine about officiating whereas winners find a way to win. It's also simply true that the team that is the primary aggressor usually gets fewer fouls called on it than the other team and that happened yesterday. One way to combat that is to have someone like Grant get the ball in the post and create a lot of contact on a play and maybe cause a minor scuffle and then the officials rethink the approach and start calling fouls again. UT did not have that guy and has not had that guy since Grant and it allowed Michigan, as the primary aggressor, to get the advantages the primary aggressor gets and kept it all game without the hard reset the play I am describing provides.

5. Even though Coach Barnes' tournament track record is ugly, the tournament still is the best sporting event in America, and Coach Barnes cannot play the game for the players and he cannot control some other teams' players having strangely great games - which is often just bad luck. Think back to the Ryan Cline of Purdue in 2019 going 7-10 from 3 and scoring 27 points when he averaged 6.3 ppg. Think back to the Loyola-Chicago game winner that, in the aftermath there were physics analyses done of where the ball hit the rim and the chances it goes in and it was almost, but obviously not quite, impossible and UT was missing Alexander. It felt like Michigan had 3 guys that played the best games of their season yesterday and it just happened all at once.

6. Maybe the NCAA committee got the seeding right. Maybe it rightfully thought the Big Ten was better than the SEC. Only Arkansas is on to the Sweet Sixteen and Auburn has a chance to join Arkansas. The Big Ten has Michigan (obviously) through now and has 5 teams playing today for a chance at the Sweet Sixteen.

7. All that being said, I know my disappointment is nowhere near as acute as the disappointment for UT's coaches and players. I know they gave it their all and came up short - and that is just part of life - and I appreciate what they did for me as a fan and for all of us and the program we love. The key here is will they use this to prepare for next season and learn lessons of what needs to happen or not.

Go Vols!
Sometimes a team or player is “playing over their head” because the defense is simply not up to par on a given day. I think the effort was there, but we were perhaps just a quarter of a step slow at times. I know most on here don’t want excuses, but we were playing our fifth game in nine days. Also, our coaches only had two days or less to game plan.

It was a good, close game where either team could have won, and I believe we would have if we had just hit a couple of threes in the last ten minutes.

It was simply the luck of the draw that we found a Michigan team that was hitting on all cylinders. No reason to make a mountain out of a molehill. We simply need to work on improving who we have and adding depth where needed. We are really close to getting over the top, and really felt like we could have made it this year.

Edit: Not disagreeing. Just adding additional thoughts.
 
Last edited:

VN Store



Back
Top