Hmmm...
11 MISSOURI over *Tennessee
Late Score Forecast:
MISSOURI 35 - *Tennessee 24
"Maturing UT has strung together SEC wins for the first time since 2010. But, we cant pass up grabbing a FG with
more seasoned Mizzou, which controls its own destiny in its quest to repeat as the SEC East Division champ.
Clearly, the Tigers played their most complete game of the year in Mizzous 34-27 upset victory at talented Texas
A&M.
They played the worst D in the SEC by far with them missing their best DL and starting QB... and won by 7 points.
Columbia sources report that Tiger coaches devoted extra practice time with the offensive linemen in order
to help them better finish their blocks. That plan paid immediate rewards, with the potent RB tandem of Russell
Hansbrough & Marcus Murphy combining for 287 YR vs. the Aggies.
Everyone with a pulse whose played TAM has been able to run the ball. They gave up 481 yds of O to Rice... RICE!
And with Tigers efficient soph QB Maty Mauk
benefiting from the healthy return of key 6-3 sr. WR Darius White (missed previous 2 tilts; 6 grabs vs. A&M), the
nicely-balanced Mizzou attack continues to thrive vs. a green Vol defense.
Efficient? Since when? He's completing less than 50% of his passes vs the SEC. He has a 5/6 TD to INT ration against the SEC. His last two games have come against UK and TAM. He completed 55% of his passes for 164 yds and 2 TD's vs UK. Dobbs just lit them up for 297 in 3 qtrs with 3 TD's and a 70% completion rate. Mauk has played better against two terrible D's in his last two games.... better than awful still might not be very good.
Sure, Vols soph QB Josh Dobbs has
been en fuego vs. the highly-pliable defenses of South Carolina (31 ppg) & Kentucky (30 ppg). But Mr. Dobbs
figures to cool off vs. the tenacious Tiger stop unit (20 ppg; 3.3 ypc), spearheaded by the hard-charging bookend
DEs Markus Golden & Shane Ray, whove combined for 20 sacks TY.
Mauk is "efficient" for playing "better" vs two bad D's but Dobbs' success is somehow tainted by playing two bad D's and producing better numbers?
Mauk's "improvement" has occurred against UK and TAM who allows even more ppg to SEC opponents that USCe.
Speaking of "bookend" DE's... Ray and Golden have combined for 18, not 20 sacks. Burnett and Maggitt have combined for 17. ALL of Burnett's and Maggitt's have come against their TOUGHER SEC slate. Only 9 of the MU combo's have come against the SEC.
Golden only has 2.5 sacks vs SEC competition with 2 of those against TAM.
Hence, Mizzou notches its 10th straight win/
cover as a visitor...........Vols have covered last 3 and 4 of last 5 TY.
Hence, the selective and shallow use of statistics by this writer... is pretty stupid. Mizzou may win... but the abuse of numbers by this guy is pretty profound.
Pinkel, however, has won and covered last two years vs. UT, and is 12-1 vs.
spread last 13 as visitor!...............
Interesting... but not much bearing on this particular game.
Missouri 32 - TENNESSEE 26Cognizant that mobile 6-3 soph Joshua
Dobbs has ignited the Vol attack. But still must endorse superior Mizzou, which
controls its fate in the SEC East.

lol:

lol: Superior? I guess that's been proven by how they've dominated that tough schedule they've played, huh?
Look for Tigers productive QB Maty Mauk
(accounted for 277 yds. in LYs meeting) to (again) take advantage of a young
UT defense. Road-lovin Mizzou has covered last 9 as a visitor."
Washington, Lucas, and DGB are gone. MU's current receivers do not even closely compare in talent or productivity. Mauk productive?
In 3 games including Bama who is far better than any D Mauk has faced, Dobbs has passed for 790 yds completing 62% of his passes with 7 TD's against 2 INT's. All of this against SEC competition.
Mauk vs SEC competition has played 6 games and passed for 806 yds. He's completing a whopping 47% of his passes with 5 TD's against 6 INT's.
Who is GS? Mauk's momma?
Basically what I am pointing out here is that there's no way a rational person can look at the statistics chosen by this writer and conclude that Mizzou should win. Dobbs has produced far better than Mauk. UT's DE's have played better vs the SEC than Mizzou's.
There may be other reasons for MU to win... but these aren't good ones.