MyBloodRunnethOrange
Jesus is Lord
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2004
- Messages
- 116,671
- Likes
- 24,240
I'll agree with this to a point, but I am affliated with a high school team the cordinators make 97% of the reads and calls an 99% of the substitutions..
So there wasn't any other play during the game that mattered? A missed tackle, missed fg or any other play that wasn't executed as called had no effect on the outcome?
Of course there was. If we make that 4th and inches we're not even talking about this. If we don't give up a 4th and 14. If LSU doesn't turn the ball over again and again. That's not the point. If we don't have too many men on the field, we win the game.So there wasn't any other play during the game that mattered? A missed tackle, missed fg or any other play that wasn't executed as called had no effect on the outcome?
Posted via VolNation MobileWas this TNs first road game? YES
Was it 50% of the team's first road game? YES
Are a good percent of the players freshman? YES
Do young players make young player mistakes? YES
Was there more than one play that decided the game? YES
Did the coaches have players in position to win the game at the end? YES
Did they win? NO
Live with it.
Take it out on GA next week.
It is crystal clear that there are a plethora of "Vols Fans" who find it their life's mission to demean, and even question, the effectiveness of our coaching staff. After 22 years of coaching, I can tell you with 100% certainty that we all make mistakes. No coach has ever, nor will ever, get it right every time. The mistakes we have all witnessed thus far are indicative of the blending of a new coaching staff and players demoralized by an unstable program over the last 3+ years. While we all (I pray) bleed Orange, we don't have the right, nor true insight, to bash our staff because "I" would do it differently. Vol Nation has fallen into the greatest pitfall facing any program on the rocks, negativity. I have read several post of those who declare each week that the sky is falling on our prestigious and beloved program. Now before several of you get your negative soap box out to bash this post understand two things. 1) I too see areas which need to be addressed, but have experienced firsthand the limitations a coach has when teaching everything that needs to be taught in the practice time alloted. This is a program we all knew was in a rebuilding state, no surprise that there are going to be areas of weakness. 2) Let this coaching staff establish a foundation with which to rebuild our proud tradition of dominance. The body of their work over the next five years will determine the worth of this coaching staff. Rome was not built in a day, and the old adage, "It takes five years to build an elite program" still rings true. Gut check time Vol Nation. Are you a fare weather fan, or a true Volunteer?
So is getting to 0:00 on the clock with a 17-10 lead against a team that has avg'd a number 6 recruiting class over the last 5 years and has a depth chart loaded with guys who have been around 2+ years WITH UT's current roster.
Correct. How many times do you see teams come to the line and the QB will stop and look at the sideline for the call. It was a bad coaching call not to have the defense you wanted on the field and the subs standing ready to go. My thought is put your best 11 on the field and play ball no subbing on the last play of the game.
We already had the guys on the field to cover their recievers. It's not like you're worried about getting beat deep in that situation.Your best 11 for defending a 3 or 4 wide spread is different than your best 11 for defending a goaline offense with 7-9 Ols. That is common sense. One of the commentators said it best "LSUs incompetence brought out UTs inexperience".
And we already had the players on the field to match up with their recievers that they sent in. Jackson, Evavs, Waggner, and Teague were already on the field before any substitutions were made. You only have 10 yards to cover. You don't have to worry about getting beat deep.Those who do not understand that football is about match ups should stop with their critical analysis. If you understand anything about match ups, then you know why their was substituting taking place.
We're supposed to take time off the clock, but we throw play action on 2nd and 3. We go for it on 4th down and it's the most predictable play ever. We rush 3 men on 4th and 14 and have the rest just lay back. Did they forget we sacked their ****** QB WHEN WE PRESSURED HIM? You can make all the excuses in the world for this team and their problems, but we should have won this game by at least 2 scores
And we already had the players on the field to match up with their recievers that they sent in. Jackson, Evavs, Waggner, and Teague were already on the field before any substitutions were made. You only have 10 yards to cover. You don't have to worry about getting beat deep.
We're supposed to take time off the clock, but we throw play action on 2nd and 3. We go for it on 4th down and it's the most predictable play ever. We rush 3 men on 4th and 14 and have the rest just lay back. Did they forget we sacked their ****** QB WHEN WE PRESSURED HIM? You can make all the excuses in the world for this team and their problems, but we should have won this game by at least 2 scores
Nitpicking, armchair second guessers always amaze me.On 2d and 3, if we don't make it, you will complain that we ran the most predictable playe ever.
Most predictable play ever? I am confidant that if we ran a sweep, or tried a short pass and it didn't work, you'd be criticising that decision too. If you can't bang out 1/2 yard, you are not going to be able to do much else either.
As for rushing 3 men on 4th and 14, if you'll recall, we blitzed earlier on 3d and 11 and they burned us.
Must be easy to second guess every decision that doesn't pan out. Do you get second guessed by anonymous idiots in your job?
yes im sure its not dooleys falt