The WRASSLIN’ Thread

Here is a fun idea I had that could lead to some more interesting storylines.

How about instead of having every title or almost every title defended at each PPV WWE only has 1 or 2 at each PPV except for the big 4 PPV's where all titles are defended.

For example at Backlash have the US and IC titles defended and let them main event and co main event the PPV.
Then have tag title number 1 contender matches for each show. Then we could have some matches for low card feuds that dont involve belts, or have some matches where someone could be built up
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I think NXT is probably better from top to bottom then it’s ever been . The talent there is amazing . I been trying to get a friend to watch it for a while now . He is always saying how WWE does the same thing over and over .
 
Anyone wanna guess Stephanie’s “historic announcement” for RAW? I’m thinking women tag belts
 
Got around to watching the IC match from Extreme Rules. I don’t even know if it was good or not. Those fans ruined it. Seriously? I’m all about the fans using their voice and having fun but damn. I don’t even know what the point of that was. It was just annoying.
 
So, can anyone tell me why WWE hasn't invented a "Network" or "Streaming" title yet?

Have it to where the title is defended 24/7 like the old Hardcore title was, but the rule being if the match itself isn't streamed in some way the defense doesn't count. This allows them to defend it on RAW or PPVs still, but also have 10-15 minute matches on Youtube or Facebook during a random Friday, and it also allows you to let guys who are popular with fans but don't get much tv time (Tye Dillinger for example) or lets them take advantage of viral situations like how Titus fell at the Rumble get quality matches in, even rehearsed matches if wanted to make up and comers look as good as possible ala Lucha Underground style.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement





Back
Top