- Joined
- Nov 23, 2012
- Messages
- 75,811
- Likes
- 104,610
Here's a relatively non-controversial topic (lol) that should get the partisan juices flowing. Currently, we have the newer Ford Class aircraft carriers in production and with a planned run of a minimum of five, possibly more, in the long run. Currently, the lead ship is named after President Gerald Ford. The next two are planned to be named the USS Enterprise (which name has been a long and distinguished one in the US Navy service) and the USS John F Kennedy (also used previously as the lead class of aircraft carrier).
Currently, the US Navy has the following aircraft carriers in service named after Presidents:
USS Dwight Eisenhower
USS Teddy Roosevelt
USS Abe Lincoln
USS George Washington
USS Harry Truman
USS Ronald Reagan
USS George H. W. Bush
Should we stop the press right there? Only one President post WWII does not have a ship named after them nor one planned (Nixon). However, the other two post WWII Presidents do have ships named after them with Carter having a submarine and Johnson having a destroyer. Right now, the exceptions are: Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama which haven't had their name come up yet. And obviously Trump who is still in office.
FYI, 19 of the 45 Presidents have never had a ship named after them.
So, the question is with the two additional Ford class carriers planned, do they continue naming after Presidents with the chance of significant partisan outrage, even though Presidents are historic figures in United States history?
Or should the Navy move back to more historic names for aircraft carriers that have served with distinction like the USS Yorktown (WWII), USS Saratoga (WWII), USS Midway (Vietnam, Desert Storm), etc and avoid the politics of naming after controversial Presidents or other political figures?
Currently, the US Navy has the following aircraft carriers in service named after Presidents:
USS Dwight Eisenhower
USS Teddy Roosevelt
USS Abe Lincoln
USS George Washington
USS Harry Truman
USS Ronald Reagan
USS George H. W. Bush
Should we stop the press right there? Only one President post WWII does not have a ship named after them nor one planned (Nixon). However, the other two post WWII Presidents do have ships named after them with Carter having a submarine and Johnson having a destroyer. Right now, the exceptions are: Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama which haven't had their name come up yet. And obviously Trump who is still in office.
FYI, 19 of the 45 Presidents have never had a ship named after them.
So, the question is with the two additional Ford class carriers planned, do they continue naming after Presidents with the chance of significant partisan outrage, even though Presidents are historic figures in United States history?
Or should the Navy move back to more historic names for aircraft carriers that have served with distinction like the USS Yorktown (WWII), USS Saratoga (WWII), USS Midway (Vietnam, Desert Storm), etc and avoid the politics of naming after controversial Presidents or other political figures?