The Trump Effect

#753
#753
utvolpj said:
Again you're parsing words that aren't there to explain away terrible statistics. The claim is false and you should be skeptical when you're reading statistics like "Biden’s border crisis accounted for 100 percent"
Click to expand...
---Biden is the one to allow illegals into the country causing a strain on rental properties
---you can choose to rejects the stats but the stats show 100% NET growth was from "migrants"
 
#754
#754
jmacvols1 said:
---Biden is the one to allow illegals into the country causing a strain on rental properties
---you can choose to rejects the stats but the stats show 100% NET growth was from "migrants"
Click to expand...
That's not what has been stated you're simply adding words you likely found in the Twitter replies. What was stated is pretty much impossible

No objective evaluation would include "Biden's border crisis."
 
#756
#756
utvolpj said:
AI slop aside, the wording is intentionally misleading. For 100% of the growth to be correct there would be no Americans moving to NY or CA and looking for housing. That seems plausible?
Click to expand...

If there would have been a decline in demand if not for immigrants, would it not be accurate to say that 100% of the growth is due to immigrants?

I had 5 apples last month and 5 oranges for a total of 10 pieces of fruit. The following month I have 4 apples and 7 oranges for a total of 11 pieces of fruit. My increase in pieces of fruit MOM is 100% the result of my increase in oranges.
 
#759
#759
vols4sure said:
If there would have been a decline in demand if not for immigrants, would it not be accurate to say that 100% of the growth is due to immigrants?

I had 5 apples last month and 5 oranges for a total of 10 pieces of fruit. The following month I have 4 apples and 7 oranges for a total of 11 pieces of fruit. My increase in pieces of fruit MOM is 100% the result of my increase in oranges.
Click to expand...
It's only correct if you believe that there was not a single non-immigrant looking for a new home. The increase over a period of time is a number. What % were immigrants is a value that can easily be determined. If it's can't then their number can't be valid either

Given the biased wording of the study, the trump admin claiming anything in ca or ny is 100% is most likely made up. They're very consistent in that respect
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77 and BernardKingGOAT
#763
#763
BigOrangeMojo said:
An incredible amount of state funded corporate welfare here. Over $100K per job (up to $130K if enhanced business plans are filed, which almost certainly they were) just from state grants/hiring credits. Nothing like paying 110-130K for $80K jobs...

Im not even going to get into the hundreds of millions of property tax abatements, sales tax abatements, industrial machinery credits, etc. Likely looking at $1M+ for each job created. For $80K a year jobs.

And we havent started with any IRA or Chips Act federal incentives.

While I get the federal side of it (dont agree with it but I get), the state just absolutely got ripped a new one just to align with Trump.
Click to expand...
Right out of the liberal playbook.
 
#775
#775
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and tim
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top